Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

08:27
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
7.3K
CORRECTING FOR MEASUREMENT ERROR IN LATENT VARIABLES USED AS PREDICTORS.
1Swarthmore College, Department of Mathematics and Statistics.
The Annals of Applied Statistics
|March 16, 2016
Summary
New math and personality insights reveal factors influencing STEM retention for underrepresented groups. These findings can inform interventions to boost persistence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields.
Area of Science:
- Educational Research
- Psychology
- Sociology
Background:
- Racial and gender disparities persist in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields.
- Existing models may not fully account for measurement error in latent variables predicting STEM retention.
- Understanding factors influencing STEM persistence is crucial for developing effective interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- Introduce a novel methodological approach, the Mixed Effects Structural Equations (MESE) model.
- Investigate the roles of pre-college mathematics proficiency and personality in STEM retention.
- Quantify the contribution of these factors to racial and gender disparities in STEM.
Main Methods:
- Developed the Mixed Effects Structural Equations (MESE) model, integrating structural equations modeling and item response theory.
- Utilized data from the 1997 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY).
- Applied the MESE model to analyze predictors of STEM retention in higher education.
Main Results:
- Prior mathematics proficiency and personality traits were found to be significant, previously underestimated predictors of STEM retention.
- These factors collectively explain substantial portions of the observed racial and gender gaps in STEM persistence.
- The MESE model effectively addressed measurement error bias in generalized linear models.
Conclusions:
- Pre-college mathematics proficiency and personality are critical determinants of STEM retention.
- Interventions aimed at increasing STEM persistence should consider these factors, particularly for women and under-represented minorities.
- The MESE model offers a robust framework for analyzing complex relationships in educational research.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
113.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
113.5K
Random and Systematic Errors
16.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.0K
Random and Systematic Errors
927
927
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
672
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
672
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K
Distance Corrections
359
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
359

