Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Improving Access and Reducing the Burden on Public Ophthalmology: Collaborative Telehealth Models Between Ophthalmology and Optometry in Australia.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026

Same author

Evaluation of a Collaborative Telehealth Model for Eye Care Between Ophthalmology and Optometry in Western Australia.

The Australian journal of rural health·2026

Same author

Small areas of damage due to glaucoma are less likely to be identified by SITA-Faster than SITA-Standard.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026

Same author

Spatial suppression of motion and motion segmentation in peripheral vision.

Journal of vision·2026

Same author

Deprescribing in Older People: A Clinical Practice Guideline Summary.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026

Same author

Pulvinar-posterior superior temporal sulcus connectivity contributes to non-conscious emotion processing in affective blindsight.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026

Same journal

The Role of Nrf2 in SIRT1-Mediated RGC Neuroprotection in Traumatic Optic Neuropathy.

Translational vision science & technology·2026

Same journal

Explicit Inclusion of Diabetes Mellitus Without Retinopathy Within Diabetic Retinopathy Prediction.

Translational vision science & technology·2026

Same journal

Preclinical Safety and Feasibility Study of Line-Field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography for Ophthalmology Applications.

Translational vision science & technology·2026

Same journal

Pathogenicity Analysis of Two Novel CRB1 Mutations in Three Chinese Inherited Retinal Dystrophy Families and a Literature Review.

Translational vision science & technology·2026

Same journal

Gas-Lesion Contact and Postural Compliance After Vitrectomy With Tamponade: A Continuous Monitoring and 3D Quantitative Analysis.

Translational vision science & technology·2026

Same journal

Automated Deep Learning Quantification of Avascular Area and Intravitreal Neovascularization in Retinal Flatmounts of Rodent Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy Models.

Translational vision science & technology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Incorporating Spatial Models in Visual Field Test Procedures.

Nikki J Rubinstein¹, Allison M McKendrick², Andrew Turpin³

¹Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia ; Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Translational Vision Science & Technology

|March 17, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new visual field (VF) algorithm, Spatially Weighted Likelihoods in Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (SWeLZ), can significantly reduce testing time for normal VFs without compromising accuracy. This offers potential time savings in clinical settings.

Keywords:

glaucoma perimetry visual field

More Related Videos

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

Area of Science:

Ophthalmology
Medical Technology
Computational Science

Background:

Visual field (VF) testing is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring conditions like glaucoma.
Current perimetry algorithms can be time-consuming, impacting patient throughput and experience.
There is a need for more efficient VF testing methods without sacrificing diagnostic precision.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and evaluate a novel perimetric algorithm, Spatially Weighted Likelihoods in Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (SWeLZ).
To assess SWeLZ's ability to reduce test durations by incorporating spatial information into visual field estimates.
To determine if SWeLZ maintains or improves output precision and accuracy compared to existing methods.

Main Methods:

SWeLZ employs a maximum likelihood Bayesian procedure, updating probability mass functions using spatial models derived from empirical and computational data.
Simulations were conducted comparing SWeLZ against the standard ZEST algorithm using a dataset of normal and glaucomatous visual fields (Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2).
Key output measures included the number of presentations and visual sensitivity estimates.

Main Results:

SWeLZ demonstrated no significant difference in accuracy or precision compared to ZEST across various spatial models and sensitivity levels.
The algorithm successfully identified localized VF loss in simulated visual field maps.
For normal VFs, SWeLZ reduced the median number of presentations by 20-38%, while performance was equivalent to ZEST for glaucomatous VFs.

Conclusions:

SWeLZ is a novel perimetric algorithm with the potential to significantly decrease visual field test times in patients with normal visual fields.
The algorithm achieves these time savings without compromising the precision and accuracy of results, particularly for glaucomatous VFs.
The efficiency gains offered by SWeLZ could lead to substantial time savings in clinical ophthalmology practices.