Adjustments in 2011 KSS increase the clinical suitability
Acta Orthopaedica Belgica
|March 18, 2016
Summary
The adjusted Knee Society Score (2011 KSS-A) improves patient completion rates and maintains clinical quality for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. This enhanced questionnaire simplifies assessment while ensuring reliable data collection.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Medical Statistics
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Background:
- The 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) is a validated tool for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but suffers from low patient completion rates (42%).
- Suboptimal scale features and lack of clear administration rules may contribute to low engagement.
- Improvements are needed to enhance the clinical utility and patient adherence to the KSS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate an adjusted version of the 2011 KSS (2011 KSS-A) to improve completion rates and maintain clinimetric quality.
- To simplify the questionnaire while ensuring its reliability and validity for TKA patients.
Main Methods:
- The 2011 KSS was modified based on identified limitations, creating the 2011 KSS-A.
- A cohort of 499 primary TKA patients completed the 2011 KSS-A pre- and postoperatively via mail.
- Clinimetric properties, including internal consistency, correlations with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), and responsiveness, were evaluated.
Main Results:
- The adjusted questionnaire achieved a 70% response rate and 90% completion rate, significantly higher than the original KSS.
- Excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha ≥0.79) and strong correlations with KOOS-PS were observed.
- All subscales demonstrated significant improvement postoperatively, with moderate to large effect sizes, though some ceiling effects were noted.
Conclusions:
- The adjusted 2011 KSS-A is a shortened, simplified, and more clinically useful questionnaire for TKA patients.
- The 2011 KSS-A maintains excellent clinimetric quality and demonstrates improved patient engagement.
- This adjusted tool offers a more efficient and effective method for assessing TKA outcomes.

