Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Quantitative Analysis of Cellular Composition in Advanced Atherosclerotic Lesions of Smooth Muscle Cell Lineage-Tracing Mice
Published on: February 20, 2019
Prediction of atherosclerotic disease progression using LDL transport modelling: a serial computed tomographic
Antonis Sakellarios1, Christos V Bourantas2,3, Stella-Lida Papadopoulou4
1Unit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Insights
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) transport simulation in CTCA-reconstructed arteries predicts coronary artery disease progression. This method, combined with plaque characteristics, offers moderate accuracy in identifying segments with significant plaque burden increase.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention
- Biomedical Engineering
- Translational Medicine
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) progression is a major cause of cardiovascular events.
- Predicting vulnerable coronary segments is crucial for timely intervention.
- Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) provides detailed anatomical information.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) transport simulation in CTCA-derived arterial models.
- To predict coronary segments prone to significant atherosclerotic disease progression.
- To compare LDL transport simulation with endothelial shear stress (ESS) in predicting disease progression.
Main Methods:
- Reconstruction of coronary arteries from CTCA data of 32 patients with acute coronary events.
- Performance of LDL transport simulation in baseline arterial models.
- Analysis of LDL concentration, plaque burden, plaque area, and ESS as predictors of disease progression over 3 years.
Main Results:
- High LDL concentration, plaque burden, and plaque area were independent predictors of substantial disease progression.
- LDL concentration was a more accurate predictor than ESS (65.1% vs. 62.5% accuracy).
- ESS was a univariate predictor but not independent when LDL concentration was included.
Conclusions:
- LDL transport modeling, combined with CTCA-derived atheroma characteristics, shows moderate accuracy in predicting mid-term plaque burden increase.
- LDL transport simulation appears to be a superior predictor of atherosclerotic disease progression compared to ESS.
- This approach aids in identifying coronary segments at risk for significant plaque progression.
Aim:
To investigate the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) transport simulation in reconstructed arteries derived from computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) to predict coronary segments that are prone to progress.
Methods And Results:
Thirty-two patients admitted with an acute coronary event who underwent 64-slice CTCA after percutaneous coronary intervention and at 3-year follow-up were included in the analysis. The CTCA data were used to reconstruct the coronary anatomy of the untreated vessels at baseline and follow-up, and LDL transport simulation was performed in the baseline models. The computed endothelial shear stress (ESS), LDL concentration, and CTCA-derived plaque characteristics were used to identify predictors of substantial disease progression (defined as an increase in the plaque burden at follow-up higher than two standard deviations of the intra-observer variability of the expert who performed the analysis). Fifty-eight vessels were analysed. High LDL concentration [odds ratio (OR): 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64-2.84; P = 0.0054], plaque burden (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.13-1.72; P = 0.0017), and plaque area (OR: 3.46; 95% CI: 2.20-5.44; P≤ 0.0001) were independent predictors of a substantial disease progression at follow-up. The ESS appears as a predictor of disease progression in univariate analysis but was not an independent predictor when the LDL concentration was entered into the multivariate model. The accuracy of the model that included the LDL concentration was higher than the accuracy of the model that included the ESS (65.1 vs. 62.5%).
Conclusions:
LDL transport modelling appears a better predictor of atherosclerotic disease progression than the ESS, and combined with the atheroma characteristics provided by CTCA is able to detect with a moderate accuracy segments that will exhibit a significant plaque burden increase at mid-term follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Incorporating Hepatic Transporter-Mediated Clearance
A recent model describes pravastatin's hepatobiliary excretion,...
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Inflammation
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction

