Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
Differential performance of first-trimester screening in predicting small-for-gestational-age neonate or fetal growth
F Crovetto1,2, S Triunfo1, F Crispi1
1BCNatal - Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Deu), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, and Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Barcelona, Spain.
Objective:
To assess the ability of integrated first-trimester screening, combining maternal characteristics and biophysical and biochemical markers, to predict delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate, and compare this with its ability to predict fetal growth restriction (FGR).
Methods:
This was a prospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies undergoing routine first-trimester screening. SGA was defined as birth weight (BW) < 10th percentile and FGR was defined as an ultrasound estimated fetal weight < 10th percentile plus Doppler abnormalities, or BW < 3rd percentile. Logistic regression-based predictive models were developed for predicting SGA and FGR. Models incorporated the a-priori risk from maternal characteristics, and mean arterial pressure, uterine artery Doppler, placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1.
Results:
In total, 9150 births were included. Of these, 979 (10.7%) qualified for a postnatal diagnosis of SGA and 462 (5.0%) for a prenatal diagnosis of FGR. For predicting SGA, the model achieved a detection rate of 35% for a false-positive rate (FPR) of 5% and 42% for a 10% FPR. The model's performance was significantly higher for predicting FGR (P < 0.001), with detection rates of 59% and 67%, for a FPR of 5% and 10%, respectively.
Conclusion:
The predictive performance of first-trimester screening for cases with growth impairment by a combination of maternal characteristics and biophysical and biochemical markers is improved significantly when a prenatal and strict definition of FGR is used rather than a postnatal definition based on BW. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Regression Toward the Mean
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...

