GO annotation in InterPro: why stability does not indicate accuracy in a sea of changing annotations

Amaia Sangrador-Vegas1, Alex L Mitchell2, Hsin-Yu Chang2

  • 1European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK amaia@ebi.ac.uk.

Summary

Annotation removal from biological databases does not always indicate errors. Annotation stability in protein sequence and family databases can be influenced by data-driven events, not just curator mistakes.

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
15.4K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.8K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
15.0K
Protein-Protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-Protein Interfaces

4.6K