Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

226
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
226
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

31.1K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
31.1K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

37.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
37.8K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

874
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
874
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

835
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
835
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

19.0K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
19.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Youth Perspectives on the Climate Crisis: Motivation and Action Pathways.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Neural variability across the transition to motherhood: Enhanced moment-to-moment neural variability during mentalizing in first-time mothers.

Journal of neuroendocrinology·2026
Same author

Mood trajectories showing resilience and recovery in young people during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Adolescents' emotional support to friends and family: A resiliency-promoting factor amidst and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Developmental psychology·2025
Same author

Bias is not color blind: Ignoring gender and race leads to suboptimal selection decisions-A registered report.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.8K

Lies that feel honest: Dissociating between incentive and deviance processing when evaluating dishonesty.

Gert-Jan Lelieveld1, Shaul Shalvi2, Eveline A Crone3

  • 1Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Biological Psychology
|March 21, 2016
PubMed
Summary

When people judge others' lies, their brains show heightened activity in key areas like the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and prefrontal cortex. Greater brain responses occurred when evaluating justifiable lies compared to unjustifiable ones.

Keywords:
ConflictDorsal ACCEvaluationJustificationsLiesfMRI

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.8K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding how the human brain processes and evaluates deceptive behavior is crucial for comprehending social interactions and ethical judgments.
  • Previous research has explored deception detection, but less is known about the neural correlates of evaluating different types of lies made by others.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural responses associated with evaluating honest reports versus justifiable and unjustifiable lies.
  • To identify specific brain regions involved in judging misconduct and differentiate responses based on the nature of the lie.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to measure brain activity in participants.
  • Participants evaluated scenarios involving honest reports, justifiable lies, and unjustifiable lies related to a die-rolling task for determining pay.

Main Results:

  • Evaluating lies compared to honest reports increased activation in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, and lateral prefrontal cortex.
  • Justifiable lies elicited stronger activation in the dorsal ACC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex than unjustifiable lies.
  • The magnitude of neural activation for justifiable lies correlated with the degree of deviation from the actual outcome.

Conclusions:

  • The findings highlight specific neural mechanisms underlying the evaluation of others' misconduct.
  • Brain regions like the ACC and prefrontal cortex play a significant role in differentiating and judging deceptive behaviors.
  • This research contributes to understanding the neural basis of moral judgment and social cognition.