Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
[Surgery for cardio-esophageal cancer]
Insights
This study on cardio-esophageal cancer surgery in 369 patients shows tailored surgical approaches improve outcomes. Differentiated treatment based on adenocarcinoma type enhances radicality, reduces complications, and increases survival rates.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Gastroenterology
Context:
- Cardio-esophageal cancer presents a significant surgical challenge.
- Accurate classification of adenocarcinoma is crucial for treatment planning.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the efficacy of differentiated surgical strategies for cardio-esophageal cancer based on adenocarcinoma classification (J.R. Siewert).
- To analyze surgical outcomes, including radicality, complications, and survival, in relation to treatment approach and tumor type.
Summary:
- A retrospective analysis of 369 patients with cardio-esophageal cancer treated at Kazan Republic Clinical Oncology Center.
- Patients were classified into three adenocarcinoma types (Siewert): Type I (12.1%), Type II (46.6%), and Type III (41.3%).
- Surgical interventions included transhiatal esophagoplasty, transthoracic esophagoplasty (Lewis, Gerlock), and gastrectomies with esophageal resection, tailored to adenocarcinoma type.
Impact:
- A differentiated surgical approach based on adenocarcinoma type leads to more radical procedures.
- This tailored strategy reduces both early and long-term complications associated with cardio-esophageal cancer surgery.
- Specific procedures like transhiatal and transthoracic esophagoplasty are feasible for Type I adenocarcinoma, while gastrectomies for Type II indicate a poor prognosis, guiding clinical decision-making.
Abstract:
The experience of surgery of 369 patients with cardio-esophageal cancer treated in the Kazan Republic Clinical Oncology Center is presented. The patients are divided into 3 groups respective of the type of adenocarcinoma (classification by J.R. Siewert). Thus, the first group consists of 45 (12.1%) patients, the second--172 (46.6%) and the third--152 (41.3%) patients. Each group is divided into subgroups according to the performed operation: transhiatal esophagoplasty with esophagogastroanastomosis on the neck, transthoracal esophagoplasty (operations by Lewis and Gerlock) with intrapleural esophadogastroanastomosis and gastrectomies with high resection of esophagus. High productivity of the differentiated approach to surgical treatment of cardio-esophageal cancer depending on the type of adenocarcinoma is shown. Such approach allows the surgical treatment to be more radical, to reduce quantity of the early and remote complications and to raise the survival. So, it is revealed that performance of transhiatal and transthoracal esophagoplasty is possible in cases of type I adenocarcinoma. Gastrectomies in cases of type II adenocarcimoma are of poor prognosis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophagus
The movement of edibles from the pharynx into the esophagus is facilitated by the upper esophageal sphincter, which is formed primarily by the...

