Use of outcome measurement by paediatric AHPs in Northern Ireland

Anita Harron1, Jill Titterington2

  • 1CIDS Team, Knockbracken Healthcare Park, Belfast, UK.

Insights

Most paediatric allied health professionals (AHPs) use outcome measurement (OM), but 25% need support. Implementing OM requires protected time, expert guidance, and outcome-based funding for AHP services.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Professionals
  • Allied Health
  • Paediatric Care

Background:

  • Professional standards recommend routine outcome measurement (OM) for allied health professionals (AHPs).
  • Current policy emphasizes impact-based OM, assuming its integration into AHP practice.
  • Evidence for widespread OM adoption in paediatric AHPs is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the readiness of paediatric allied health professionals (AHPs) in using outcome measurement (OM).
  • To identify factors influencing the use of OM among paediatric AHPs.

Main Methods:

  • A survey of 133 paediatric AHPs in the NHS, Northern Ireland, using the Clinician Readiness for Measuring Outcomes Scale (CReMOS).
  • CReMOS assessed readiness using 26 Likert scale statements based on the Transtheoretical Model of Change.

Main Results:

  • Approximately 75% of clinicians reported using OM, while 25% require support for implementation.
  • Similar patterns of OM use were observed across speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, and physiotherapists.
  • While most clinicians recognized the value of OM, various factors influenced its application.

Conclusions:

  • Paediatric AHPs would benefit from protected time and expert support to enhance OM practices.
  • Outcome-based funding for AHP services could further facilitate the adoption of OM.
  • Further research is needed to explore different OM types and their specific barriers and facilitators.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos