Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Should we transition to robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS)? A retrospective comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic TAMIS.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Strongyloides stercoralis infection presenting as a surgical diagnosis, a rare but important consideration: Case series of two patients.

International journal of surgery case reports·2025
Same author

Is proctoring in robotic surgery truly helpful? Evaluating general surgeons' perspectives.

Journal of robotic surgery·2025
Same author

Robotic-Assisted Ascending Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer in a Patient With Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Laparoscopic Management of Grade C Anastomotic Leak following Left-Sided Colorectal Resection.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2025
Same author

Colitis Cystica Profunda of the Hepatic Flexure: A Case Report.

Cureus·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Caudal-to-cranial Approach in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolon Excision and D3 Lymph Node Dissection
06:46

Caudal-to-cranial Approach in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolon Excision and D3 Lymph Node Dissection

Published on: January 9, 2026

302

Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: a single surgeon's experience.

Henry J Lujan1, Victor H Maciel2, Roderick Romero2

  • 1Laparoscopic Center of South Florida, Jackson South Community Hospital, 9195 Sunset Drive, Suite 230, Miami, FL, 33173, USA. hlujan1000@aol.com.

Journal of Robotic Surgery
|March 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Robotic right colectomy (RRC) is a safe and feasible alternative to laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC), demonstrating comparable patient outcomes. While RRC involves longer operative times, it results in smaller extraction sites and reduced blood loss.

Keywords:
ColectomyLaparoscopyRobotic surgery

More Related Videos

Laparoscopic Anterior Right Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Experience
09:51

Laparoscopic Anterior Right Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Experience

Published on: December 4, 2023

1.8K
Surgical Trunk Oriented Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy (ST-LRH) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
05:58

Surgical Trunk Oriented Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy (ST-LRH) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer

Published on: July 25, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Caudal-to-cranial Approach in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolon Excision and D3 Lymph Node Dissection
06:46

Caudal-to-cranial Approach in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolon Excision and D3 Lymph Node Dissection

Published on: January 9, 2026

302
Laparoscopic Anterior Right Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Experience
09:51

Laparoscopic Anterior Right Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Experience

Published on: December 4, 2023

1.8K
Surgical Trunk Oriented Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy (ST-LRH) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
05:58

Surgical Trunk Oriented Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy (ST-LRH) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer

Published on: July 25, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Robotic Surgery

Background:

  • Growing interest in robotic techniques for colon resection.
  • The precise role of robotics in colorectal surgery remains undefined.
  • Need for comparative studies on robotic vs. laparoscopic approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of robotic right colectomy (RRC) with laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC).
  • To evaluate the safety and feasibility of RRC in elective procedures.
  • To analyze key surgical outcomes including operative time, blood loss, and complications.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of prospectively recorded data from 47 consecutive patients undergoing elective right colectomy (25 LRC, 22 RRC).
  • Procedures performed by a single, board-certified colon and rectal surgeon.
  • Key outcomes: conversion rate, operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), extraction site length, length of stay (LOS), and complications.

Main Results:

  • RRC showed longer operative times (OT) and total operating room times (TORT) compared to LRC (P < 0.001).
  • RRC resulted in significantly smaller extraction site lengths (P = 0.008) and lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (P = 0.037).
  • No conversions to open surgery, no leaks, and no 30-day mortality were observed in either group; LOS and complication rates were similar.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic right colectomy (RRC) is safe and feasible, yielding outcomes comparable to laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC).
  • While RRC currently has longer operative times, these are improving and compare favorably with published LRC data.
  • Reduced extraction site length and EBL in RRC warrant further investigation for clinical significance.