Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

Quantitative Static and Dynamic Assessment of Balance Control in Stroke Patients
Published on: May 17, 2020
Using a goal attainment scale in the evaluation of outcomes in patients with diplegic cerebral palsy
D McMorran1, L W Robinson1, G Henderson2
1University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Insights
Both surgical and non-surgical interventions effectively improved gait in children with diplegic cerebral palsy, with the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) reflecting patient aspirations and outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Diplegic cerebral palsy significantly impacts children's gait and mobility.
- Evaluating intervention effectiveness requires patient-centered outcome measures.
- The Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) offers a personalized approach to assessing therapeutic success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical interventions for improving gait in children with diplegic cerebral palsy using GAS.
- To assess the correlation between GAS outcomes and objective gait analysis metrics.
- To determine the relevance of GAS as a patient-reported outcome measure in this population.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 45 children with diplegic cerebral palsy was divided into surgical (n=20) and non-surgical (n=25) intervention groups.
- Personalized goals were established pre-intervention and assessed post-intervention using a 5-point GAS questionnaire via telephone.
- GAS scores were standardized to T-scores; a subset of 16 children also underwent follow-up gait analysis.
Main Results:
- Both intervention groups achieved their personal goals, with the non-surgical group showing higher average goal attainment (mean T-score 56.3 vs. 47.1).
- The difference in GAS scores between the groups was statistically significant (p=0.010).
- No significant correlation was found between GAS scores and Gait Profile Scores in the subset analyzed.
Conclusions:
- Both surgical and non-surgical interventions are effective in helping children with diplegic cerebral palsy achieve their functional goals.
- GAS provides a valuable, patient-centered perspective on intervention outcomes, potentially complementing objective biomechanical measures.
- The findings support the use of GAS as a relevant outcome measure in pediatric gait rehabilitation.
Abstract:
A goal attainment scale (GAS) was used to evaluate outcomes of surgical and non-surgical interventions to improve gait in 45 children with diplegic cerebral palsy. Personal goals were recorded during pre-intervention gait analysis in two groups. Twenty children underwent orthopaedic surgery (Group 1) and 25 children received a non-operative intervention (Group 2). Children and/or their carers were contacted post-intervention by telephone to complete a GAS questionnaire, rating the achievement of goals on a 5-point scale. The goals were similar in both groups. The composite GAS was transformed into a standardised measure (T-score) for each patient. Both groups on average achieved their goals (mean T-score for Group 2 was 56.3, versus 47.1 for Group 1). The difference between these two means was significant (p=0.010). Additionally, 16 children had undergone a follow-up gait analysis during the study period, but the relationship between their Gait Profile Score and GAS was not statistically significant. Both surgical and non-surgical interventions enabled children to achieve their goals, although Group 1 reported higher achievements. The GAS reflects patient's/parent's/carer's aspirations and may be as relevant as post-intervention kinematic or kinetic outcomes.
More Related Videos
07:52Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
07:20Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Nursing Evaluation
Section...