Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

376
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
376
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

15
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
15
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

360
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
360
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

18.5K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
18.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mobile intervention for emerging adults with regular cannabis use: a micro-randomized trial.

Lancet regional health. Americas·2026
Same author

CSF p-tau Predicts Asymmetric Hippocampal Atrophy in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Study protocol: A micro-randomized trial for a just-in-time adaptive intervention to manage problem anger after trauma (Shift).

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Heterogeneity and misaligned incentives in discharge transition programs: Insights from a multisite rapid qualitative study.

Journal of hospital medicine·2026
Same author

Drug Development.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Biomarkers.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Multiple testing procedures for adaptive enrichment designs: combining group sequential and reallocation approaches.

Michael Rosenblum1, Tianchen Qian2, Yu Du2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA mrosen@jhu.edu.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|March 24, 2016
PubMed
Summary

New statistical methods enhance adaptive enrichment designs by adjusting enrollment based on trial data. These powerful procedures control Type I error rates, improving clinical trial efficiency for subpopulations.

Keywords:
Multiple testing procedureTreatment effect heterogeneity

More Related Videos

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

Published on: August 18, 2023

6.2K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

Published on: August 18, 2023

6.2K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methodology

Background:

  • Adaptive enrichment designs allow modification of enrollment criteria during a trial.
  • These designs can stop enrollment for subpopulations with evidence of efficacy, futility, or harm.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose novel multiple testing procedures for adaptive enrichment designs.
  • To enhance statistical power and maintain Type I error control in adaptive trials.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesizing modified group sequential and alpha reallocation approaches.
  • Leveraging covariance between statistics across trial stages and hypotheses.
  • Lowering rejection thresholds for remaining hypotheses after others are rejected.

Main Results:

  • The proposed procedures demonstrate power greater than or equal to existing methods.
  • Strong control of the familywise Type I error rate is proven for normally distributed statistics.
  • Simulations illustrate application in a stroke intervention trial with two subpopulations.

Conclusions:

  • The new multiple testing procedures are effective for adaptive enrichment designs.
  • These methods offer improved statistical power and robust error control.
  • The approach is applicable to complex clinical trial scenarios.