Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.1K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.1K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

11.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
11.1K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.4K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.4K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

12.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
12.1K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.9K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.9K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.4K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MRI-Based radiomic signature for predicting pathologic treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radioimmunotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.

Skeletal radiology·2026
Same author

Mature Outcomes and Patterns of Failure in the Phase II FLARE-RT Trial of Biological Image-guided and Risk-Adaptive Chemoradiation for Unresectable NSCLC.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

Accuracy comparison of 4D computed tomography (4DCT) and 4D cone beam computed tomography (4DCBCT).

International journal of medical physics, clinical engineering and radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Generative Modeling for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging: Applications in Failure Detection and Data Curation.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Consistent performance between medical experts and non-expert readers in forced-choice lesion-detection tasks with PET images.

Medical physics·2025
Same author

Radiomics Quality Score 2.0: towards radiomics readiness levels and clinical translation for personalized medicine.

Nature reviews. Clinical oncology·2025
Same journal

MUST: Multi-style virtual staining with incomplete pairs.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same journal

BrainCL: Transformer-Based Brain Network Contrastive Learning with Multi-Order Topology and Salience Masking.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same journal

LLM-enhanced Neuron Segmentation and Reconstruction in Complex Mouse Brain Images.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same journal

Matrixed-Spectrum Decomposition Accelerated Linear Boltzmann Transport Equation Solver for Fast Scatter Correction in Multi-Spectral CT.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same journal

The Ritz Adjoint Method for MRI Pulse Design.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same journal

Physiology-guided Self-supervised Learning for Simultaneous Dual-Tracer PET Separation.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
14:08

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images

Published on: April 13, 2013

43.8K

Mixed Confidence Estimation for Iterative CT Reconstruction.

David S Perlmutter, Soo Mee Kim, Paul E Kinahan

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
    |March 24, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Mixed Confidence Estimation (MCE) reduces dynamic CT imaging radiation dose and reconstruction time. This method improves image variance by analyzing regions with varying certainty, enhancing imaging quality and efficiency.

    More Related Videos

    Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
    06:33

    Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

    Published on: July 29, 2013

    11.8K
    Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph
    05:32

    Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph

    Published on: February 21, 2025

    769

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

    Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
    14:08

    Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images

    Published on: April 13, 2013

    43.8K
    Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
    06:33

    Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

    Published on: July 29, 2013

    11.8K
    Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph
    05:32

    Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph

    Published on: February 21, 2025

    769

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Computational Imaging
    • Image Reconstruction

    Background:

    • Dynamic (4D) CT imaging faces challenges with high radiation dose and long reconstruction times.
    • Conventional CT reconstruction methods struggle to optimize for both static and dynamic image components efficiently.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a statistical analysis and generalization of the Mixed Confidence Estimation (MCE) method for dynamic CT imaging.
    • To demonstrate MCE's ability to reduce radiation dose and reconstruction time while improving image quality.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a generalized Mixed Confidence Estimation (MCE) framework applicable to images with varying confidence regions.
    • Performed statistical analysis, theoretical arguments, and proof-of-principle simulations to validate MCE.
    • Proposed and verified a fast approximation for image variance in MCE reconstructions.

    Main Results:

    • MCE reduces estimator variance in both high and low confidence image regions compared to conventional reconstruction.
    • The MCE method significantly decreases computation time.
    • A fast variance approximation for MCE was confirmed to be accurate.

    Conclusions:

    • Mixed Confidence Estimation (MCE) offers a viable solution for reducing radiation dose and reconstruction time in dynamic CT imaging.
    • The MCE method enhances image quality by reducing variance in scenarios with mixed certainty image components.
    • This approach has the potential to improve the efficiency and safety of dynamic imaging applications.