Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Specialty Tier-Level Cost Sharing and Biologic Agent Use in the Medicare Part D Initial Coverage Period Among
Jalpa A Doshi1, Tianyan Hu2, Pengxiang Li3
1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. jdoshi@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Objective:
To examine associations between specialty tier-level cost sharing and use of biologic agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during Medicare Part D's initial coverage period (ICP).
Methods:
This was a retrospective study using 2007-2010 5% sample Medicare files to examine RA patients with use of a Part D RA biologic agent in the prior year. Patients without low-income subsidies (non-LIS group), who faced specialty tier-level cost sharing, were compared to a control group of low-income subsidy patients (LIS group), who faced nominal out-of-pocket costs in the ICP. Outcomes included use of a Part D or Part B RA biologic agent during the ICP and presence of a ≥30-day continuous gap in treatment among Part D biologic agent users in the ICP. Risk-adjusted outcomes were estimated using logistic regressions, controlling for patient demographic, clinical, and Part D plan characteristics.
Results:
On average, a 30-day Part D biologic agent supply cost the non-LIS group $484 out of pocket (29.9% cost sharing) versus $5 (0.3% cost sharing) for the LIS group. The non-LIS group was less likely to fill Part D biologic agents (61.2% versus 72.7%, odds ratio [OR] 0.58 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.46-0.72]; P < 0.001), more than twice as likely to receive Part B biologic agents (9.9% versus 4.4%, OR 2.41 [95% CI 1.61-3.60]; P < 0.001), and less likely to use any biologic agent (70.1% versus 76.9%, OR 0.69 [95% CI 0.55-0.88]; P = 0.002). The non-LIS subgroup filling Part D biologic agents had approximately twice the odds of a gap in both Part D biologic agent and any biologic agent availability.
Conclusion:
Specialty tier-level cost sharing was associated with interruptions in RA biologic agent treatment among Medicare patients.
Insights
Higher prescription drug costs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) biologic agents in Medicare Part D led to treatment gaps for patients without low-income subsidies. This highlights cost-related barriers to essential RA biologic treatments.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Health Economics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment often involves costly biologic agents.
- Medicare Part D's specialty tier cost-sharing can significantly impact patient out-of-pocket expenses.
- Understanding the effect of cost-sharing on biologic agent utilization is crucial for patient adherence and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between specialty tier cost-sharing and the use of biologic agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- To compare RA patients facing high out-of-pocket costs with those having low-income subsidies in Medicare Part D.
- To analyze treatment patterns, including biologic agent use and treatment gaps, during the initial coverage period (ICP).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 2007-2010 Medicare 5% sample files.
- Comparison of RA patients without low-income subsidies (non-LIS group) to those with low-income subsidies (LIS group).
- Logistic regression models used to estimate risk-adjusted outcomes, controlling for patient and plan characteristics.
Main Results:
- Non-LIS patients faced significantly higher out-of-pocket costs for biologic agents ($484 vs. $5).
- Non-LIS patients were less likely to fill Part D biologic agents (61.2% vs. 72.7%) and any biologic agent (70.1% vs. 76.9%).
- Non-LIS patients were more likely to use Part B biologic agents (9.9% vs. 4.4%) and experienced longer treatment gaps.
Conclusions:
- Specialty tier cost-sharing in Medicare Part D is associated with reduced biologic agent use and treatment interruptions in RA patients.
- Financial barriers significantly influence treatment adherence for RA biologic agents.
- Policy interventions may be needed to mitigate cost-related non-adherence for RA patients in Medicare Part D.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management

