Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Problems in antiemetic trial design and interpretation.

S H Krasnow1

  • 1Oncology Section, VA Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)
|August 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy for squamous cell esophageal carcinoma.

American journal of clinical oncology·1997
Same author

Porocarcinoma of the heel. A case report with unusual histologic features.

Cancer·1996
Same author

Nonsurgical closure of esophago-respiratory fistulas: role for the somatostatin analogue octreotide acetate?

The American journal of the medical sciences·1994
Same author

Morphine for dyspnea in patients with cancer.

Annals of internal medicine·1994
Same author

Closure of tracheoesophageal fistulas with primary chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Cancer·1994
Same author

Nocardiosis after corticosteroid therapy for malignant thymoma.

Cancer·1993

Antiemetic research methodology needs improvement. This review of 44 trials highlights gaps in study design and assessment criteria compared to cancer treatment research.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pharmacology

Background:

  • Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control research is emerging.
  • Antiemetic clinical trial methodology currently lags behind cancer treatment trial standards.
  • Accurate assessment requires sound study design, controlled variables, clear definitions, and reproducible criteria.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the methodology of 44 antiemetic trials.
  • To assess the current state of antiemetic research.
  • To identify areas for improvement in antiemetic trial design and data utilization.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of 44 published antiemetic trials.
  • Analysis of patient selection, study design, and assessment parameters.
  • Comparison with methodologies used in chemotherapy treatment trials.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant variability exists in the methodological rigor of antiemetic trials.
  • Key areas such as patient selection and outcome assessment show inconsistencies.
  • Antiemetic trials often lack the robust design features seen in cancer treatment studies.

Conclusions:

  • Improvements in antiemetic trial design are crucial for reliable data.
  • Standardizing assessment criteria and study parameters will enhance research validity.
  • Optimizing antiemetic research will improve patient care during chemotherapy.