Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

Perception

Perception

Perception is a fundamental psychological process that enables individuals to organize, interpret, and consciously experience sensory information. This process is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world around us. It includes both bottom-up and top-down processing, each playing a distinct role in how we perceive our environment.
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Dazzle camouflage: benefits and problems revealed.

Royal Society open science·2024

Same author

Spatial and Temporal Selectivity of Translational Glass Patterns Assessed With the Tilt After-Effect.

i-Perception·2021

Same author

Correction: Mather, G. Aesthetic Image Statistics Vary with Artistic Genre. <i>Vision</i> <b>2020</b>, <i>4</i>, 10.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2021

Same author

A Step to VAR: The Vision Science of Offside Calls by Video Assistant Referees.

Perception·2020

Same author

Is the perception of intent by association football officials influenced by video playback speed?

Royal Society open science·2020

Same author

Edge-Enhanced Disruptive Camouflage Impairs Shape Discrimination.

i-Perception·2019

Same journal

Desert lizards modulate nutritional responses to match seasonal biological needs.

Royal Society open science·2026

Same journal

Multi-generational fidelity, ecological and social determinants of roosting in a cooperatively breeding bird (<i>Argya squamiceps</i>).

Royal Society open science·2025

Same journal

Multifaceted polarization and information reliability in climate change discussions on social media platforms.

Royal Society open science·2025

Same journal

Comparing the kinematics related to inflicted head injury between violent shaking of a 6-week-old and a 1-year-old infant surrogate.

Royal Society open science·2025

Same journal

Partner choice increases observed reciprocity-based cooperation but decreases unobserved stake-based cooperation.

Royal Society open science·2025

Same journal

Importation models for travel-related SARS-CoV-2 cases reported in Newfoundland and Labrador during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Royal Society open science·2025

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Decision-level adaptation in motion perception.

George Mather¹, Rebecca J Sharman¹

¹School of Psychology, College of Social Science University of Lincoln Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.

Royal Society Open Science

|March 29, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Adaptation to visual stimuli can alter responses. This study shows implied motion adaptation stems from decision-making biases, not sensory changes, impacting visual perception.

Keywords:

implied motion motion adaptation normalization response bias

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Visual Perception

Background:

Sensory adaptation to visual stimuli can cause response biases.
These biases are often attributed to changes in sensory neuron activity.
An alternative explanation involves shifts in decision criteria (decision-level bias).

Purpose of the Study:

To determine if adaptation to implied motion arises from sensory-level or decision-level bias.
To investigate the role of task demands in adaptation-induced biases.
To explore the generalizability of decision-level bias in sensory processing.

Main Methods:

Three experiments were conducted to differentiate between sensory and decision-level adaptation.
The nature of the participant's task was manipulated while keeping the visual stimulus constant.
Adaptation effects were measured using both directional and non-directional judgment tasks.

Main Results:

Adaptation-induced bias in perceived motion direction was observed only when participants performed a directional judgment task.
This directional bias disappeared when the task required only detecting the presence of motion, irrespective of direction.
The findings indicate that the task's nature is critical in observing adaptation effects.

Conclusions:

Adaptation to implied motion is primarily driven by decision-level bias, not sensory changes.
The results suggest that decision-level biases may be a common feature in various sensory decision-making processes.
Understanding these biases is crucial for interpreting perceptual judgments and their underlying neural mechanisms.