Progression of moderate-to-severe carotid disease
William K Winter1, Benjamin B Zorach1, Patrick A Arpin1
1Department of Surgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
Insights
Carotid artery disease progression depends on definition. Initial severity, not demographics or medications, predicts progression. An internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity of 165 cm/s identifies high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Cardiology
- Neurology
Background:
- Asymptomatic moderate carotid artery disease (50%-79% stenosis) requires risk stratification for progression.
- Patient demographics, risk factors, labs, and medications' influence on progression is unclear.
- Defining progression criteria impacts risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate factors influencing moderate carotid disease progression.
- Determine if progression definition affects identified risk factors.
- Establish optimal criteria for high-risk patient categorization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 621 internal carotid arteries (ICA) with moderate stenosis (50%-79%).
- Progression defined by three end points: liberal (PSV ≥230 cm/s), moderate (ICA/CCA ratio ≥4.0), and strict (diastolic ICA velocity ≥140 cm/s).
- Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and ROC curve analysis for risk stratification.
Main Results:
- 5-year progression rates varied: 28.5% (liberal), 21.1% (moderate), 5.1% (strict).
- Initial PSV ≥200 cm/s, ICA/CCA ratio ≥3, and male gender were associated with progression (liberal/moderate criteria).
- Initial PSV ≥165 cm/s showed high sensitivity (90.7%) and specificity (58.7%) for high-risk categorization over 2 years.
Conclusions:
- Carotid disease progression definition significantly impacts incidence and identified risk factors.
- Initial stenosis severity is the primary predictor of progression, independent of other factors.
- Propose an initial ICA PSV ≥165 cm/s as a threshold for identifying high progression risk.
Objective:
Our goals were to investigate the degree to which patient demographics, risk factors, laboratory data, and medications influence moderate carotid disease progression among patients with asymptomatic moderate carotid disease and whether such associations are solely based on how progression is defined. In addition, we aimed to establish optimal threshold criteria to categorize patients at high risk of progression.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, 621 arteries were evaluated for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis between January 1997 and January 2014 and were determined to have moderate (50%-79%) stenosis via color duplex ultrasonography. "Moderate stenosis" was defined as an ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≥120 cm/s and a diastolic ICA velocity <140 cm/s. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the time to progression was conducted using three independent end points: PSV ≥230 cm/s (liberal criterion); ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) ratio ≥4.0 (moderate criterion), and diastolic ICA velocity ≥140 cm/s (strict criterion). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated, and multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression models. Risk stratification criteria were based on optimal sensitivity and specificity generated from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results:
The overall rate of progression was 28.5%, 21.1%, or 5.1% of study-eligible arteries over 5 years using liberal, moderate, or strict criterion, respectively. Using liberal criterion, multivariate analysis suggested that initial PSV ≥200 cm/s, ICA/CCA ratio ≥3, and male gender were significantly associated with progression. Using the moderate criterion, multivariate analysis revealed that initial PSV ≥200 cm/s, ICA/CCA ratio ≥3, age, and male gender were significantly associated with progression. Using the strict criterion, multivariate analysis revealed that initial PSV ≥200 cm/s was the only statistically significant predictor of progression. No additional patient demographics, comorbidities, initial laboratory values, or medications consistently influenced disease progression across any criteria in our study. ROC analysis suggests PSV ≥165 cm/s is an ideal threshold value for the categorization of high risk patients, as this resulted in an optimal screening sensitivity of nearly 91% and a specificity of 59% over 2 years.
Conclusions:
The timing and incidence of carotid disease progression depends on the definition of disease progression. Among all three criteria, only severity of disease at initial presentation reliably predicted progression. Based on the results of our ROC curve analysis, we propose that an initial ICA PSV ≥165 cm/s (sensitivity: 90.7%, specificity: 58.7%) represents a reasonable value for defining high progression risk over a 2-year interval.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology


