Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscles for Facial Expressions01:14

Muscles for Facial Expressions

5.6K
The craniofacial muscles are a collection of approximately 20 thin skeletal muscles situated beneath the skin of the face and scalp. These muscles, primarily responsible for the vast array of human facial expressions, originate from the bones or fibrous structures of the skull and extend outwards to connect with the skin. While most skeletal muscles in the body are enveloped in thick fascia, facial muscles generally have a more delicate fascial covering, with the buccinator muscle being a...
5.6K
Sutures of the Skull01:22

Sutures of the Skull

14.1K
The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
14.1K
Overview of the Skull01:08

Overview of the Skull

8.8K
The cranium (skull) is the skeletal structure of the head that supports the face and protects the brain. It is subdivided into the facial bones and the brain case, or cranial vault. The facial bones underlie the facial structures, form the nasal cavity, enclose the eyeballs, and support the teeth of the upper and lower jaws.
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
8.8K
Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification01:29

Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification

14.4K
Intramembranous ossification is one of the two processes involved in the development of bones within an embryo. The flat bones of the face, most of the cranial bones, and the clavicles are formed via this process. During intramembranous ossification, the bones develop directly from sheets of undifferentiated mesenchymal connective tissue.
The process begins when mesenchymal cells in the embryonic skeleton gather together and differentiate into osteogenic cells, which then develop into ...
14.4K
Classification of Bones01:18

Classification of Bones

12.4K
The bones of the human skeletal system are of varied shapes, sizes, and functions. They can be classified based on their shape and function into four major classes: long bones, short bones, flat bones, and irregular bones. Some classifications include a fifth type, the sesamoid bones, as a separate class, whereas others categorize them under short bones.
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
12.4K
Cranial Bones: Lateral View01:27

Cranial Bones: Lateral View

7.9K
The lateral view of the cranium is dominated by temporal, sphenoid, and ethmoid bones.
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
7.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Revisiting the Palimpsest: Exploring the Interaction of the Variance and Structure of Developmental Determinants of Phenotypic Covariance.

Integrative and comparative biology·2026
Same author

Three-dimensional cellular dynamics and mandibular morphogenesis.

Frontiers in cell and developmental biology·2026
Same author

Impaired Remodeling of Tight Junctions Associated with Loss of Enamel Rod Decussation in Tgfbr2<sup>G357W/+</sup> Mice.

Calcified tissue international·2026
Same author

Inorganic arsenic exposure and modifying factors: a systematic evidence map.

Human and ecological risk assessment : HERA·2026
Same author

Loeys-Dietz syndrome: 2026 updated care management primer.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

Using end-to-end attribution to link greenhouse gas emitters to child health outcomes.

Archives of disease in childhood·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

376

Facial surface morphology predicts variation in internal skeletal shape.

Nathan M Young1, Krunal Sherathiya2, Luis Gutierrez3

  • 1Assistant professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics : Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
|March 30, 2016
PubMed
Summary

External 3D facial shape accurately reflects internal skeletal morphology, offering a safe alternative to radiation-based imaging for growth prediction. This validates using surface scans for personalized craniodental and treatment plans, minimizing patient risk.

More Related Videos

Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
06:26

Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry

Published on: December 9, 2025

270
Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

376
Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
06:26

Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry

Published on: December 9, 2025

270
Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Orthodontics
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Accurate 3D imaging is crucial for facial growth prediction models.
  • X-ray modalities like cone-beam computed tomography pose risks, especially for pediatric patients.
  • External 3D facial shape may serve as a safe proxy for internal skeletal morphology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the extent to which external 3D facial shape accurately represents skeletal morphology.
  • To test the hypothesis that population-level variations in external facial shape and internal skeletal shape covary.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 3D surface and skeletal morphology data from a cone-beam computed tomography database.
  • Application of geometric morphometrics and multivariate statistical analyses.

Main Results:

  • External facial morphology strongly predicts internal skeletal shape variation (Rv = 0.56, P <0.0001).
  • External shape also reliably predicts skeletal asymmetry (Rv = 0.34, P <0.0001).
  • Age- and size-related shape variations were highly correlated with external morphology.

Conclusions:

  • 3D surface morphology is a dependable proxy for characterizing skeletal shape variation.
  • This approach is valuable for research minimizing risks from radiologic imaging.
  • Longitudinal surface data can aid personalized craniodental and treatment planning while reducing radiation exposure.