Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice
Jorien Veldwijk1, Brigitte A B Essers2, Mattijs S Lambooij3
1Centre for Prevention and Health Services Research, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Attribute framing significantly impacts decision-making. Positive framing of survival increased dominant choices, while negative framing of mortality led to risk-seeking behavior in genetic screening choices.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Health Decision Science
- Risk Perception
Background:
- Attribute framing, a cognitive bias, influences decision-making by presenting information in a positive or negative light.
- Understanding framing effects is crucial for designing effective health communication and choice experiments.
- Genetic screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) involves complex risk-benefit trade-offs, making it susceptible to framing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how positive versus negative attribute framing affects respondent choices and preferences in a discrete choice experiment (DCE).
- To analyze the impact of framing on decision-making behavior and attribute importance in the context of colorectal cancer (CRC) genetic screening.
Main Methods:
- A discrete choice experiment (DCE) with two versions (positive and negative risk framing) was administered to a representative Dutch sample (aged 55-65).
- The DCE included four attributes related to CRC genetic screening participation, with the risk attribute framed as survival probability (positive) or mortality probability (negative).
- Panel mixed-logit models were employed to estimate attribute importance and compare preferences between the two framing conditions.
Main Results:
- Positive framing (survival) led to 56% ranking it as most important, versus 8% for negative framing (mortality).
- Respondents exhibited significantly more dominant choices based on survival probability compared to mortality probability.
- Attribute framing substantially altered attribute-level estimates and revealed distinct preference structures between the positively and negatively framed groups.
Conclusions:
- The way risk information is framed significantly influences how individuals perceive and value that risk.
- Positive risk framing promotes more decisive, dominant choices, whereas negative framing encourages risk-seeking behavior.
- Attribute framing is a critical consideration in designing discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and expert interviews for health decisions.
More Related Videos
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
06:08Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Factorial Design
Attribution Theory
Reason and Intuition