MET Exon 14 Skipping in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Rebecca S Heist1, Hyo Sup Shim2, Shalini Gingipally3

  • 1Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA rheist@partners.org.

The Oncologist
|March 30, 2016
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

MET exon 14 skipping is a targetable genetic alteration in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This finding suggests that MET inhibitors may effectively treat patients with this specific NSCLC subtype.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exhibits sensitivity to targeted therapies based on specific genetic alterations.
  • Identifying actionable mutations is crucial for effective NSCLC treatment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the frequency and clinical significance of MET exon 14 skipping alterations in NSCLC.
  • To evaluate the potential of MET inhibitors for patients with MET exon 14 skipping.

Main Methods:

  • A targeted rearrangement assay was conducted on 54 NSCLC samples from never-smokers without driver mutations.
  • Retrospective analysis of MET exon 14 skipping cases identified through molecular profiling at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH).

Main Results:

  • MET exon 14 skipping was the most frequent alteration in the studied cohort, found in 19% of never-smokers.
  • Overall frequency of MET exon 14 skipping in NSCLC was estimated at 5.6% through clinical testing.
  • A case report details a patient with MET exon 14 skipping successfully treated with the MET inhibitor crizotinib.

Conclusions:

  • MET exon 14 skipping represents a targetable driver alteration in NSCLC.
  • Patients with MET exon 14 skipping may benefit from MET-targeted therapies.
  • Molecular testing for MET exon 14 skipping is recommended for all NSCLC patients to identify potential treatment candidates.

Related Concept Videos

Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions01:12

Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions

Tumor suppressor genes are normal genes that can slow down cell division, repair DNA mistakes, or program the cells for apoptosis in case of irreparable damage. Hence, they play an essential role in preventing the proliferation of damaged cells.
When the tumor suppressor genes develop mutations or are lost, cells start growing out of control, leading to cancer. However, a single functional copy of the tumor suppressor gene is enough for the cells to maintain their normal functions and cell...
6.2K
Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions01:12

Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions

2.0K
Exon Recombination02:32

Exon Recombination

The evolution of new genes is critical for speciation. Exon recombination, also known as exon shuffling or domain shuffling, is an important means of new gene formation. It is observed across vertebrates, invertebrates, and in some plants such as potatoes and sunflowers. During exon recombination, exons from the same or different genes recombine and produce new exon-intron combinations, which might evolve into new genes. 
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
4.3K
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes01:05

Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes

Genes usually encode proteins necessary for the proper functioning of a healthy cell. Mutations can often cause changes to the gene expression pattern, thereby altering the phenotype.
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
10.0K
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes01:05

Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes

2.9K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
8.2K