Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Half-segmental Diaphyseal Bone Defect Model in Rats for Evaluating Bone Substitute Performance in Load-bearing Regions
Published on: December 30, 2025
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BONE NEOFORMATION USING AUTOLOGOUS GRAFTING AND THREE REPLACEMENTS: BONE DEFECTS IN RATS
Rodrigo Steffen Stein1, Jefferson Braga Silva2, Vinicius Duval da Silva3
1Master of Health Sciences (Surgical Clinic), PUC/RS; Implantology Specialist, ABO/RS.
Objective:
Compare the percentage of bone neoformation promoted by autologous bone grafting and three kinds of replacement materials with different characteristics in rats' femoral holes.
Methods:
Two holes measuring 5.4×2.7mm, were produced on each femur (right and left) of 14 isogenic Wistar rats. Each of the four defects produced was filled by autologous bone or by one of three tested materials-hydroxyapatite (HA), Genphos(®) (HA+ β-TCP) and GenMix(®) (a combined bovine bone graft). In the end of the 6-week (n = 6) and 12-week (n = 8) periods, the animals were sacrificed. The sections (stained with Picro-Sirius) were assessed by optical microscopy and specific software.
Results:
The groups with autologous bone were shown to be significantly superior to the others at both assessed times, showing a mean bone formation rate ± SD of 90.6 ± 10.8% in six weeks, and 98 ± 9.2% in 12 weeks (p > 0.0001 for both assessed times). In six weeks, the results for the other groups were the following: Genphos(®), 46 ± 7.1%; HA, 43.1 ± 8.4%; and GenMix(®), 57.3 ± 4.5%. In 12 weeks: Genphos(®), 47.8 ± 11.1%; HA, 39.9 ± 5.4%; GenMix(®), 59.7 ± 4.8%, significant (p = 0.007).
Conclusions:
In both assessed times, the three bone replacement materials tested in the study showed to be inferior to autologous bone graft for bone neoformation percentage.
More Related Videos
02:56Author Spotlight: The Box-Cavity Cortical Approach for Enhanced Evaluation of Biomaterials and Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 21, 2023
08:41Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019