Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Academic pediatric clinical research: factors associated with study implementation duration
Delphine Meier-Girard1,2,3,4,5, Annick Tibi6,7, Hendy Abdoul8,9,10
1Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR-1123 ECEVE, F-75019, Paris, France. delphine.gd@gmail.com.
Insights
Pediatric research implementation is often delayed. Interventional studies, especially those involving drug therapy with age-inappropriate formulations or dosages, face significant delays. Anticipating pharmaceutical challenges is key to faster study completion.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Research
- Pediatric Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Pediatric research faces ethical, methodological, and technical challenges, leading to implementation delays.
- Identifying factors influencing the duration of hospital-based pediatric studies is crucial for improving efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify factors associated with the implementation duration of hospital-based pediatric studies.
- To analyze the impact of funding mechanisms, methodological factors, and pharmaceutical aspects on study timelines.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 139 hospital-based pediatric studies sponsored by AP-HP (2002-2008).
- Multivariable mixed linear models assessed associations between funding, methodology, and implementation duration.
- Subgroup analysis explored pharmaceutical factors in drug therapy studies.
Main Results:
- Median implementation duration was 17.1 months, increasing over time (2002-2008).
- External and internal funding, and multi-center designs were associated with reduced duration.
- Interventional studies, particularly those involving drug therapy, placebo-controlled designs, and pediatric-only populations, showed increased duration.
Conclusions:
- Interventional pediatric studies, especially drug therapy trials, experience significant implementation delays.
- Challenges with age-appropriate drug/placebo formulation and supply contribute to delays.
- Proactive anticipation of pharmaceutical-related difficulties is essential to avoid implementation delays.
Background:
The ethical, methodological, and technical aspects of pediatric research, often results in complications and delays in implementation. Our objective was to identify factors associated with the implementation duration of hospital-based pediatric studies.
Methods:
All hospital-based pediatric studies sponsored by AP-HP between 2002 and 2008 were retrospectively identified. Association of the funding mechanism and methodological factors with the implementation duration was assessed using a multivariable mixed linear model. Pharmaceutical factors were explored as part of a subgroup analysis restricted to the studies involving drug therapy. Given that we took an exploratory approach, factors associated with implementation duration with p < 0.10 were kept in the final models.
Results:
A total of 139 studies were evaluated. The median implementation duration was 17.1 months (range: 0.9-55.3 months), and tended to increase over time (from 14.9 [25(th) percentile-75(th) percentile: 11.5-19.9] months in 2002 to 23.7 [15.2-31.0] months in 2008, p = 0.01). External (coefficient [95 % confidence interval]: -7.7 [-11.9;-3.5] months, p < 0.001) and internal funding (-5.3 95 % CI [-9.8;-0.8], p = 0.02) compared to governmental funding and number of centers (-0.1 95 % CI[-0.2;0.02] months for 1 center increase, p = 0.07) were associated with reduced duration, whereas interventional study (either involving drug therapy (6.0 95 % CI[0.7;11.3] months, p = 0.03 or not (3.5 95 % CI[-0.3;7.3] months, p = 0.06) was associated with increased duration compared to observational study. Regarding the 35 studies involving drug therapy, external funding decreased duration (-6.7 95 % CI[-13.2;-0.2] months, p = 0.05), whereas studies involving solely a pediatric population (7.8 95 % CI[1.1;14.5] months, p = 0.01) (compared to mixed adult-pediatric population), a placebo-controlled design (6.6 95 % CI[0.9;12.3] months, p = 0.01), and inappropriate drug formulation for at least one drug used in the study (6.9 95 % CI[-0.2;14.0] months, p = 0.06) were associated with increased duration.
Conclusion:
Implementation of hospital-based pediatric studies primarily faced delays when they were interventional and, in particular, when they involved drug therapy. Regarding the latter, difficulties that resulted in delayed studies arose with respect to the supply of drugs and placebo in age-appropriate dosages and route of administration. Therefore, difficulties related to the use of pharmaceuticals need to be anticipated earlier in order to avoid implementation delays.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Clinical Trials: Overview
Longitudinal Studies
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

