Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Bleeding after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction
H H Erlemeier1, W Zangemeister, L Burmester
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, West Germany.
232 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated either with 2 x 10(6) IU urokinase as an intravenous bolus injection, or 250,000 IU streptokinase intracoronary, or 60 mg recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) over 90 min. All patients enrolled had chest pain for more than 30 min and less than 3 h before admission and a typical electrocardiogram. Contra-indications to thrombolytic treatment were absent. All bleeding complications occurring within 24 h after admission were assumed to be due to thrombolytic therapy. Bleeding complications occurred in 14 patients (6.5%). Only seven patients received a blood transfusion (3%). No correlation was evident between previous hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, sex, age, fibrinogen level before and 24 h after thrombolytic therapy and bleeding complications. The risk of bleeding was not significantly different between the different thrombolytic regimens despite marked differences in the fall of the fibrinogen level. The decrease of fibrinogen following thrombolytic therapy did not influence the patency rate of the infarct vessel. Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction is a safe treatment even among patients advanced in years and with medically controlled hypertension and diabetes mellitus, irrespective of the kind of thrombolytic treatment.
232 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated either with 2 x 10(6) IU urokinase as an intravenous bolus injection, or 250,000 IU streptokinase intracoronary, or 60 mg recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) over 90 min. All patients enrolled had chest pain for more than 30 min and less than 3 h before admission and a typical electrocardiogram. Contra-indications to thrombolytic treatment were absent. All bleeding complications occurring within 24 h after admission were assumed to be due to thrombolytic therapy. Bleeding complications occurred in 14 patients (6.5%). Only seven patients received a blood transfusion (3%). No correlation was evident between previous hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, sex, age, fibrinogen level before and 24 h after thrombolytic therapy and bleeding complications. The risk of bleeding was not significantly different between the different thrombolytic regimens despite marked differences in the fall of the fibrinogen level. The decrease of fibrinogen following thrombolytic therapy did not influence the patency rate of the infarct vessel. Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction is a safe treatment even among patients advanced in years and with medically controlled hypertension and diabetes mellitus, irrespective of the kind of thrombolytic treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

