Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Neonatal Heterotopic Rat Heart Transplantation Model for the Study of Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition
Published on: July 21, 2023
Era effect on survival following paediatric heart transplantation
Bahaaldin Alsoufi1, Shriprasad Deshpande2, Courtney McCracken2
1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA balsoufi@hotmail.com.
Insights
Pediatric heart transplantation survival has improved, especially for children with acquired conditions, but long-term outcomes remain a challenge. Advances in care have not fully addressed ongoing issues diminishing late survival in these complex cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Transplant Surgery
- Immunology
Background:
- Pediatric heart transplantation is a life-saving procedure for end-stage heart failure in children.
- Despite advances in care, outcomes following pediatric heart transplantation have shown inconsistent improvements.
- Understanding the impact of different eras on survival is crucial for optimizing patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the institutional experience with pediatric heart transplantation.
- To examine the effect of different treatment eras on early and late survival rates.
- To identify risk factors influencing survival in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 320 children who underwent heart transplantation between 1988 and 2015.
- Competing risk analysis was used to model post-transplantation events, including retransplantation and death.
- Multivariable parametric risk hazard analysis identified factors affecting patient survival.
Main Results:
- Patients were categorized into congenital (41%), acquired (48%), and retransplant (11%) groups.
- Ten-year survival rates were 61% for acquired, 51% for congenital, and 45% for retransplant groups.
- Overall 10-year survival improved from 49% in the early era (1988-2004) to 63% in the late era (2005-15) (P=0.022), with significant early survival improvement seen in the acquired pathology group.
Conclusions:
- The impact of treatment era on early survival varies by underlying pathology, with significant gains in acquired cases but not in congenital or retransplant groups.
- Potential areas for improvement include pre-transplant stabilization and immunosuppression management.
- Advances in care have not significantly improved late survival, indicating persistent challenges in long-term outcomes for pediatric heart transplant recipients.
Objectives:
Paediatric heart transplantation is performed to salvage children with end-stage heart failure from various underlying pathologies. Despite several developments in all management aspects of transplantation candidates, the effect of those advances on outcomes has not been consistent. We report our institutional experience with focus on examining era effect on early and late survival.
Methods:
Between 1988 and 2015, 320 children underwent heart transplantation. Competing risk analysis modelled events after transplantation (retransplantation, death without retransplantation). Multivariable parametric risk hazard analysis examined the risk factors affecting survival.
Results:
Patients were divided to three groups based on underlying pathology: congenital group (n = 132, 41%), acquired group (n = 153, 48%) and retransplant group (n = 35, 11%). Competing risk analysis showed that at 10 years following transplantation, 11% of patients had undergone retransplantation, 39% had died without retransplantation and 44% were alive without retransplantation. Ten-year survival was 61, 51 and 45% for acquired, congenital and retransplant groups, respectively. Overall, survival following heart transplantation for the late era (2005-15) was 63% compared with 49% for the early era (1988-2004) at 10 years (P = 0.022). Compared with early era, 1-year survival in the late era was 84 vs 79% {odds ratio (OR): 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-1.8], P = 0.470} for congenital, 98 vs 86% [OR: 0.14 (95% CI 0.03-0.68), P = 0.006] for acquired and 73 vs 88% [OR: 2.6 (95% CI 0.4-1.9), P = 0.282] for retransplant. The effect of late era on survival was not significant for congenital [hazard ratio (HR) 0.6 (95% CI 0.2-1.4), P = 0.206] or retransplant patients [HR: 1.7 (95% CI 0.5-5.5), P = 0.400], but showed improvement trend for acquired patients [HR: 0.53 (95% CI 0.3-1.0), P = 0.052].
Conclusions:
The era effect on early survival following heart transplantation is related to underlying pathology; there is a significant improvement in early survival in children with acquired pathology, whereas there is no significant change in early survival in children with congenital pathology or failed prior transplantation. This suggests a potential area for improvement that might include pretransplant stabilization and management of immunosuppression. On the other hand, era effect on late survival is not significant. This demonstrates that advances in the care of paediatric heart transplantation patients have not affected ongoing problems that diminish late survival.
More Related Videos
09:54Lung Rapid Recovery Procurement Combined with Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: August 15, 2022
05:18Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in Juvenile Landrace Swine: A LVAD Implantation Model of Pediatric Heart Failure
Published on: January 16, 2026