Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Randomized trials in orthopaedics: why, how, and when?

A Laupacis¹, C H Rorabeck, R B Bourne

¹Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Hamilton.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume

|April 1, 1989

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum: Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Association of Bariatric Physicians and Surgeons, Canadian Association of General Surgeons, Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons, Canadian Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Society, Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology, Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, London, Ont. Sept. 15-18, 2011.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022

Same author

Partnering with survivors & families to determine research priorities for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

Resuscitation plus·2021

Same author

Psychological, social and everyday visual impact of diabetic macular oedema and diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2019

Same author

Association of preoperative anaemia with cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and postoperative outcomes in noncardiac surgery: a substudy of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) Study.

British journal of anaesthesia·2019

Same author

Impact of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review on provincial concordance with respect to cancer drug funding decisions and time to funding.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2017

Same author

The UK Neovascular AMD Database Report 3: inter-centre variation in visual acuity outcomes and establishing real-world measures of care.

Eye (London, England)·2016

Rigorous evaluation of new orthopedic therapies through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial. This article details key aspects of designing and executing unbiased RCTs for orthopedic treatments.

Area of Science:

Orthopedic surgery
Clinical trial design
Evidence-based medicine

Background:

Growing need for rigorous evaluation of novel medical therapies before widespread clinical adoption.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for unbiased assessment of treatment risks and benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

To outline critical considerations for designing and conducting robust randomized clinical trials in orthopedics.
To provide guidance on essential components of orthopedic RCTs.

Main Methods:

Discussion of randomization principles and methods.
Considerations for patient and therapy selection.
Explanation of blinding techniques in clinical trials.
Overview of outcome measures, sample size calculation, and data analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical considerations in conducting RCTs.

Main Results:

Key elements for successful orthopedic RCT design identified.
Comprehensive approach to RCT execution detailed.

Conclusions:

Well-designed and executed randomized controlled trials are essential for evaluating new orthopedic interventions.
Adherence to best practices in randomization, blinding, outcome measurement, and ethical conduct ensures reliable evidence generation.