Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

09:46
Training Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Ambulate Using a Powered Exoskeleton
Published on: June 16, 2016
21.5K
Accelerometry-enabled measurement of walking performance with a robotic exoskeleton: a pilot study.
Luca Lonini1,2, Nicholas Shawen1, Kathleen Scanlan1
1Max Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 345 E Superior St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation
|April 3, 2016
Summary
A new score combining multiple features, the Gaussian naïve Bayes surprise, effectively quantifies walking ability in spinal cord injury patients using powered exoskeletons, outperforming single-variable measures.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Robotics
- Clinical Biomechanics
Background:
- Current clinical scores for exoskeleton walking often rely on single variables, limiting their discriminatory power, especially with small patient cohorts.
- Evaluating walking skills in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) using lower limb exoskeletons requires robust metrics.
- A novel score is proposed to enhance the assessment of walking ability in SCI patients using powered exoskeletons.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a new score that combines multiple features for assessing walking ability in SCI patients using powered exoskeletons.
- To compare the discriminatory power of the new multi-feature score against a standard single-feature outcome measure.
Main Methods:
- Four SCI patients were trained to walk with the ReWalk™ exoskeleton, with body accelerations recorded via wearable accelerometers.
- Four distinct features evaluating walking skills were computed from the acceleration data.
- A Gaussian naïve Bayes surprise score was calculated, comparing patient performance against expert user data.
Main Results:
- All patients demonstrated improvement in walking skills over the training period, with their scores approaching those of expert users.
- The Gaussian naïve Bayes surprise score showed significantly higher discriminative power compared to a score based solely on the number of steps.
- At the end of training, 3 out of 4 patients were statistically differentiated from expert users using the combined score (p < .001).
Conclusions:
- Integrating multiple features into a scoring system offers a more robust metric for evaluating patient progress with robotic exoskeletons.
- The developed multi-feature score demonstrates superior ability to differentiate patient skill levels compared to traditional single-variable measures.
- Future research should explore this approach with additional features and larger patient cohorts.

