Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.0K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

880
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
880
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.5K
Geometric Mean01:15

Geometric Mean

4.2K
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a data set. In some data sets, the data is inherently multiplicative, and the arithmetic mean is not useful. For example, the human population multiplies with time, and so does the credit amount of financial investment, as the interest compounds over successive time intervals.
In cases of multiplicative data, the geometric mean is used for statistical analysis. First, the product of all the elements is taken. Then, if there are n elements in the...
4.2K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

579
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
579
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phylogenetic Inference from Atomised 3D Morphometric Data: a Case Study using Kangaroos.

Systematic biology·2025
Same author

Why Do Some Lineages Radiate While Others Do Not? Perspectives for Future Research on Adaptive Radiations.

Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology·2024
Same author

Unexpectedly uneven distribution of functional trade-offs explains cranial morphological diversity in carnivores.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Limited introgression from non-native commercial strains and signatures of adaptation in the key pollinator Bombus terrestris.

Molecular ecology·2023
Same author

How much biodiversity is concealed in the word 'biodiversity'?

Current biology : CB·2023
Same author

Capturing the rapidly evolving study of adaptation.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2021
Same journal

Editorial.

Development genes and evolution·2024
Same journal

Women authors in the first 50 years of DGE-contributions and research topics.

Development genes and evolution·2024
Same journal

Molecular evolution and genetic diversity of defective chorion 1 in Anastrepha fraterculus and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera, Tephritidae).

Development genes and evolution·2024
Same journal

Effects of two chd2-knockout strains on the morphology and behavior in zebrafish.

Development genes and evolution·2024
Same journal

Zebrafish: unraveling genetic complexity through duplicated genes.

Development genes and evolution·2024
Same journal

The functional evolution of collembolan Ubx on the regulation of abdominal appendage formation.

Development genes and evolution·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum
04:32

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Published on: March 19, 2017

8.0K

Measurement error in geometric morphometrics.

Carmelo Fruciano1,2

  • 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, via Androne 81, 95124, Catania, Italy. c.fruciano@unict.it.

Development Genes and Evolution
|April 3, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Measurement error in geometric morphometrics can reduce statistical power and bias results. This study reviews methods to detect and correct for both random and systematic errors in shape analysis.

Keywords:
BiasGeometric morphometricsMeasurement errorMultivariate analysis

More Related Videos

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

10.3K
Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

376

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum
04:32

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Published on: March 19, 2017

8.0K
Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

10.3K
Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

376

Area of Science:

  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Morphometrics
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Geometric morphometrics is a mature statistical method for shape analysis in ecology and evolution.
  • Measurement error is often overlooked but can significantly impact results.
  • Random error inflates variance, reducing statistical power, while systematic bias distorts findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review common sources of measurement error in geometric morphometrics.
  • To present methods for measuring and accounting for random and non-random error.
  • To provide a practical example of error correction in shape analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common error sources in geometric morphometrics.
  • Overview of statistical techniques for quantifying measurement error.
  • Application of error correction methods to a real-world dataset.

Main Results:

  • Measurement error can lead to inflated variance and reduced statistical power.
  • Systematic bias can be misinterpreted as biological variation.
  • Methods exist to accurately measure and correct for various types of error.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing measurement error is crucial for robust geometric morphometrics analyses.
  • Proper error quantification enhances the reliability of ecological and evolutionary interpretations.
  • Standardizing error assessment improves the rigor of shape analysis studies.