Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

672
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
672
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.2K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.5K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.5K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

321
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
321
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

3.6K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated implementation of the SwabSeq COVID-19 diagnostic assay on the opentrons flex liquid-handling robot.

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease·2026
Same author

Single-cell profiling of DNA methylation in autism spectrum disorder prefrontal cortex reveals distinct regulatory and aging signatures.

Cell genomics·2026
Same author

privateST: a feasible framework for privacy-preserving spatial transcriptomics prediction from histopathology images.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Systematic evaluation of 24 extraction and library preparation combinations for metagenomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Risk prediction for cardiovascular related diseases using PRS and EHR in the Framingham Heart Study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

A Single-Cell and Spatial 3D Multi-omic Atlas of Developing Human Basal Ganglia and Inhibitory Neurons.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Integrated lipidomic and transcriptomic profiling of the host response in human malaria.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Centromeric satellite expansion drives genome evolution in the snowy owl.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Mapping the landscape of allele-specific expression in porcine genomes.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Genomic sequence evolution underlying human neocortical interareal diversification.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Regulatory mechanisms driven by functional 3'-UTR variants in alcohol use disorder and related traits.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

A longitudinal single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of bovine placentation reveals dynamic cellular hierarchies and regulatory programs.

Genome biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Multiple testing correction in linear mixed models.

Jong Wha J Joo1, Farhad Hormozdiari2, Buhm Han3

  • 1Bioinformatics IDP, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Genome Biology
|April 4, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a fast and accurate method for multiple hypothesis testing correction in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using linear mixed models (LMMs). This approach significantly reduces computation time while maintaining the accuracy of gold-standard methods.

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
10:50

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies

Published on: November 8, 2018

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
10:50

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies

Published on: November 8, 2018

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) involve analyzing millions of genetic markers, presenting a significant multiple hypothesis testing challenge.
  • Permutation tests are the gold standard for multiple testing correction in GWAS due to their ability to account for genomic correlation.
  • Linear mixed models (LMMs) are now standard in GWAS for handling population structure and improving power, but lack applicable multiple testing correction methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an efficient and accurate multiple testing correction method specifically for linear mixed models (LMMs) used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS).
  • To address the computational limitations of existing methods when applied to LMMs in large-scale genetic analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel approach for estimating per-marker thresholds within the linear mixed model framework.
  • Validated the method using both simulated and real-world datasets from human, mouse, and yeast studies.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method accurately estimates per-marker thresholds, comparable to the gold-standard permutation test.
  • Computation time was drastically reduced from months to hours, demonstrating significant efficiency gains.
  • The approach was successfully applied to diverse datasets, confirming its accuracy and broad applicability.

Conclusions:

  • An efficient and accurate multiple testing correction approach for LMMs in GWAS has been established.
  • The study provides insights into the interplay between per-marker thresholds, genetic relatedness, and heritability in genetic analyses.