Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Methodological consideration on evaluation of lung cancer screening program: one-step process and two-step process].

N Hamajima1, T Yamada, K Aoki

  • 1Dept. of Preventive Medicine, Nagoya Univ. School of Med.

Gan No Rinsho. Japan Journal of Cancer Clinics
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating lung cancer screening programs involves assessing death rate reduction (one-step) or early detection and therapy effectiveness (two-step). Both methods have statistical and economic considerations for optimal lung cancer screening strategies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences in responses to TC-81 among various arteries in dogs.

Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology·1992
Same author

Differential scanning calorimetric studies on bovine serum albumin: III. Effect of sodium dodecyl sulphate.

International journal of biological macromolecules·1992
Same author

Relationship between tissue content of TC-81 and relaxation of rat aorta.

European journal of pharmacology·1992
Same author

[The positive rate of hepatitis C virus antibody detected by the second generation method in pregnant women and influence of pregnancy and delivery on HCV infection].

Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai zasshi·1992
Same author

Selective reactivities of isocyanates towards DNA bases and genotoxicity of methylcarbamoylation of DNA.

Mutation research·1992
Same author

Molecular involvement of the pvt-1 locus in a gamma/delta T-cell leukemia bearing a variant t(8;14)(q24;q11) translocation.

Molecular and cellular biology·1992

Area of Science:

  • Medical research
  • Public health
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Lung cancer screening programs aim to reduce mortality.
  • Evaluating program effectiveness is crucial for public health initiatives.
  • Different methodologies exist for assessing screening program success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare a one-step process (death rate reduction) with a two-step process (early detection and therapy effectiveness) for evaluating lung cancer screening.
  • To analyze the statistical power and sample size requirements for each evaluation method.
  • To discuss practical considerations, including economic factors, using a workplace-based screening example.

Main Methods:

  • The study outlines two primary evaluation methods for lung cancer screening programs: a one-step process and a two-step process.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The one-step process focuses on direct reduction in lung cancer mortality rates.
  • The two-step process involves assessing early detection rates and the effectiveness of subsequent therapies.

    • Main Results:

    • The one-step method directly measures mortality reduction but may require larger sample sizes.
    • The two-step method allows for assessment of detection rates and therapy impact, offering insights into screening efficiency.
    • Statistical power and sample size considerations differ significantly between the two approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • Both one-step and two-step evaluation methods have distinct advantages and disadvantages regarding statistical power and sample size.
    • The choice of evaluation method should consider the specific goals of the lung cancer screening program.
    • Economic feasibility, as illustrated by a workplace-based screening example, is an important factor in program implementation.