Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Provides Excellent Outcomes Without Increased Cost: A Multi-Institutional
Emily A Downs1, Lily E Johnston1, Damien J LaPar1
1Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Background:
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVR) has grown in popularity. Although single centers have reported excellent outcomes, data on real-world outcomes and costs of mini-MVR are limited. Moreover, mini-MVR has been criticized as adding additional cost without clear benefit. We hypothesized that mini-MVR provides superior outcomes with incremental increased costs in a multi-institutional cohort.
Methods:
Records for patients undergoing mitral valve surgical procedures with or without atrial ablation from 2011 to 2014 were extracted from a multi-institutional, regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database and stratified according to right chest approach/minimally invasive or conventional sternotomy. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or other concomitant procedures were excluded. Patients undergoing isolated mitral surgical procedure were propensity matched according to factors, including age, comorbidities, and preoperative laboratory values; clinical outcomes and cost differences were assessed by approach.
Results:
A total of 1,304 patients underwent mitral operations, including 425 (32.6%) by minimally invasive approach. In the propensity-matched analysis (n = 355 per group), patients undergoing mini-MVR had similar rates of mortality, stroke, and other complications compared with conventional MVR. Meanwhile, patients with mini-MVR experienced shorter intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay and fewer transfusions. Importantly, total hospital costs were no different between the two matched groups.
Conclusions:
Compared with conventional sternotomy, mini-MVR in the "real world" demonstrated no differences in rates of major morbidity, but it was associated with shorter length of stay and fewer transfusions. Contrary to our hypothesis, mini-MVR can be performed with similar total hospital costs as conventional sternotomy. In summary, minimally invasive mitral surgical procedure in select patients can provide superior outcomes without increased cost.
Insights
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVR) offers comparable safety to conventional sternotomy. This approach leads to shorter hospital stays and fewer transfusions without increasing overall costs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Techniques
- Health Economics
Background:
- Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVR) is increasingly adopted, yet real-world data on its outcomes and costs are limited.
- Concerns exist that mini-MVR may increase costs without clear benefits compared to traditional methods.
- This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and economic impact of mini-MVR in a multi-institutional setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes and hospital costs of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVR) versus conventional sternotomy.
- To determine if mini-MVR provides superior outcomes and assess its cost-effectiveness in a real-world, multi-institutional cohort.
- To address the criticism that mini-MVR adds cost without significant benefit.
Main Methods:
- A multi-institutional database was used to extract records of patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery between 2011 and 2014.
- Patients were stratified into minimally invasive (right chest) or conventional sternotomy groups and propensity matched based on demographics and comorbidities.
- Clinical outcomes (mortality, stroke, complications) and total hospital costs were compared between the matched groups.
Main Results:
- In a propensity-matched analysis of 355 patients per group, mini-MVR showed similar rates of mortality, stroke, and major complications compared to conventional sternotomy.
- Patients undergoing mini-MVR experienced significantly shorter intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay.
- Fewer blood transfusions were required for patients undergoing mini-MVR, and total hospital costs were comparable between the two approaches.
Conclusions:
- Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVR) demonstrates comparable major morbidity rates to conventional sternotomy in real-world practice.
- Mini-MVR is associated with improved resource utilization, including shorter hospital stays and reduced transfusion needs.
- Contrary to initial hypotheses, mini-MVR can be performed at similar total hospital costs, offering superior outcomes without increased expenditure in select patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction

