Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Brucellar and tuberculous spondylitis: comparative imaging features.

H S Sharif1, O A Aideyan, D C Clark

  • 1Department of Radiology, Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Radiology
|May 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New features in the Saudi Medical Journal.

Saudi medical journal·2016
Same author

New features in the Saudi Medical Journal.

Saudi medical journal·2016
Same author

Hypertensive encephalopathy after successful treatment of eclampsia.

Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)·2013
Same author

Optimal solution of linear inequalities with applications to pattern recognition.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same author

Alimentary tract presentations of brucellosis.

Annals of Saudi medicine·2010
Same author

Safer administration of intravenous anaesthetics.

British medical journal·2010

Brucellar spondylitis typically affects the lower lumbar spine with limited bone destruction, while tuberculous spondylitis favors the midthoracic spine with vertebral collapse and abscesses. Imaging features can help differentiate these spinal infections.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Orthopedics

Background:

  • Brucellar and tuberculous spondylitis are serious spinal infections.
  • Differentiating between these two conditions is crucial for appropriate treatment.
  • Radiographic and advanced imaging modalities play a key role in diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify distinguishing imaging features between brucellar and tuberculous spondylitis.
  • To compare the utility of various imaging techniques in differentiating these conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of radiographs, scintigrams, CT scans, and MR images.
  • Involved 17 patients with brucellar spondylitis and 15 with tuberculous spondylitis.
  • Focused on characteristic findings in vertebral bodies, disks, and soft tissues.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Brucellar spondylitis: lower lumbar spine predilection, end-plate destruction, disk collapse, granulation tissue/edema.
  • Tuberculous spondylitis: midthoracic spine predilection, gibbus deformity, disk collapse, paraspinal abscesses.
  • MR imaging showed distinct signal intensities; scintigraphy was least helpful.

Conclusions:

  • Distinct imaging features can help differentiate brucellar and tuberculous spondylitis.
  • MR imaging is valuable for assessing spinal involvement and differentiating these infections.
  • Lower lumbar tuberculous spondylitis can mimic brucellar spondylitis on imaging.