Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Odds Ratio

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...

Kaplan-Meier Approach

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Measure what matters: Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score as the critical measure for shoulder outcomes.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2024

Same author

Current concepts in the evolution of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

JSES reviews, reports, and techniques·2023

Same author

Assessment of glenoid baseplate initial micromotion and fixation strength in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty designs using a direct shear force methodology.

Shoulder & elbow·2022

Same author

Professional Pitchers Display Differences in UCL Morphology and Elbow Gapping During Moving Valgus Stress Testing After UCL Reconstruction.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2021

Same author

Steps forward: ASES Fellows' Day & JSES Fellows' issue.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2021

Same author

Infraspinatus or teres minor fatty infiltration does not influence patient outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a lateralized glenoid.

JSES international·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Recommendations for Evaluating and Selecting Appropriately Valued Outcome Measures.

Richard J Hawkins¹

¹Orthopaedic Surgeon, Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville Health System, Greenville, South Carolina.

Instructional Course Lectures

|April 7, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Outcome scores are crucial in orthopaedic research and care, guiding value-based decisions. Selecting the right measure requires evaluating psychometrics, patient-reported outcomes, and cost-effectiveness for meaningful clinical change.

More Related Videos

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

Area of Science:

Orthopaedic research
Healthcare outcomes
Value-based care

Background:

The healthcare landscape increasingly emphasizes outcome scores in orthopaedics.
Value in healthcare is defined as achieving the best patient outcomes at the lowest cost.
Understanding the rationale for collecting outcome data is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the critical role of outcome scores in modern orthopaedic research and clinical practice.
To define the principles of value in healthcare, focusing on outcomes and cost.
To provide guidance on selecting appropriate outcome measures.

Main Methods:

Analysis of psychometric properties of outcome measures, including responsiveness, reliability, and validity.
Distinguishing between minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC).
Review of guidelines for selecting outcome measures based on value.

Main Results:

Outcome scores are integral to assessing value in orthopaedic care.
Psychometric evaluation is key to selecting reliable and valid outcome measures.
Minimal clinically important differences are prioritized by surgeons for assessing meaningful patient improvement.

Conclusions:

Selecting appropriate outcome measures requires careful consideration of psychometrics, patient-reported outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.
Validated outcome scores are essential for demonstrating value in orthopaedic research and clinical settings.
Focusing on minimal clinically important differences ensures that changes reflect genuine patient benefit.