Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

6.4K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.4K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.8K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.8K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.3K
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

1.1K
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
1.1K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

7.0K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Influence of Self-Expansion on Sexual Desire Among People in Same-Gender Interracial Relationships.

Journal of sex research·2026
Same author

Sleep loss and emotion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 50 years of experimental research.

Psychological bulletin·2023
Same author

Normative data for Chinese-English paired associates.

Behavior research methods·2019
Same author

Survival Processing Enhances Visual Search Efficiency.

Experimental psychology·2018
Same author

Does testing increase spontaneous mediation in learning semantically related paired associates?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2017
Same author

The roles of encoding strategies and retrieval practice in test-expectancy effects.

Memory (Hove, England)·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.5K

Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items.

Kit W Cho1, James H Neely2, Stephanie Crocco2

  • 1a Department of Social Sciences , University of Houston-Downtown , Houston , TX , USA.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|April 7, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Testing memory benefits future learning by enhancing both encoding and retrieval. Direct, specific testing effects are smaller than indirect, generalized effects on new material.

Keywords:
Forward testing effectRetrieval practiceRetrieval-induced facilitationTest-potentiated learningTesting effect

More Related Videos

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.4K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.5K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.4K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Forward testing effects demonstrate that testing improves memory for subsequent learning material.
  • These effects can be item-specific (for previously studied items) or generalized (for new items).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly compare item-specific and generalized forward testing effects.
  • To differentiate testing benefits arising from encoding versus retrieval processes.

Main Methods:

  • Participants studied Swahili-English word pairs across multiple lists.
  • A review phase involved either cued-recall testing or restudying specific word pairs.
  • Experimental manipulations varied the timing and content of the review phase relative to study lists.

Main Results:

  • Initially, testing benefited both old and new word pairs equally, indicating generalized effects.
  • Testing before the second study list yielded greater memory benefits than testing after.
  • Experiment 3, which intermixed old and new items in testing, revealed a significant pair-specific effect for old items.

Conclusions:

  • Forward testing effects stem from both enhanced encoding and retrieval.
  • Generalized forward testing benefits are substantially larger than direct, pair-specific benefits.