Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Sampling and Analysis of Animal Scent Signals

Sampling and Analysis of Animal Scent Signals

Published on: February 13, 2021

Scent Lure Effect on Camera-Trap Based Leopard Density Estimates.

Alexander Richard Braczkowski¹, Guy Andrew Balme^2,3, Amy Dickman^1,4

¹Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Tubney, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.

|April 7, 2016

Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Allosteric ligands with distinct properties uncover tissue-specific physiological regulation mediated by free fatty acid receptor 2.

Science signaling·2026

Same author

A new standard framework for dermal exposure assessment.

Annals of work exposures and health·2026

Same author

Physical Attractiveness and Chances of Being Invited to Interview With a Medical Residency Program: Retrospective Cohort Study.

JMIR medical education·2026

Same author

Enhancing the Potency of the Antimalarial Agent, WEHI-601, Through Stereoselective Fluorination.

ChemMedChem·2026

Same author

Advancing EEG-based assessment of consciousness and cognition in prolonged disorders of consciousness.

Communications medicine·2026

Same author

Erratum to "Biomechanical effectiveness of lower trapezius tendon transfer with intercalary tendon-bone graft versus the modified l'Episcopo procedure in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with proximal humeral bone loss [Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2025;35:e69-e79]".

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2026

Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026

See all related articles

This summary is machine-generated.

Scent lures do not improve the precision of density estimates for leopards from camera-trap surveys. Using lures did not affect leopard movement or activity, nor did it violate survey assumptions, suggesting they are not warranted for this species in productive habitats.

Area of Science:

Wildlife ecology
Conservation biology
Camera-trap methodology

Background:

Accurate density estimates for large carnivores are crucial for conservation but are often imprecise due to low detection rates in camera surveys.
Scent lures are hypothesized to increase detection rates, potentially improving estimate precision.
However, lures might violate the closure assumption in capture-recapture models by altering animal movement and activity patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the effect of scent lures on the precision and accuracy of density estimates for African leopards using camera-trap data.
To determine if scent lures impact leopard movement, activity patterns, or violate the geographic closure assumption in capture-recapture studies.

Main Methods:

Two camera-trap surveys were conducted on a protected leopard population in South Africa: a control survey and a treatment survey with scent lures.

More Related Videos

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Published on: May 1, 2016

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps

Published on: January 19, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Sampling and Analysis of Animal Scent Signals

Sampling and Analysis of Animal Scent Signals

Published on: February 13, 2021

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Published on: May 1, 2016

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps

Published on: January 19, 2020

Movement distances, temporal activity of male and female leopards, and geographic closure were assessed for both surveys.

Density estimates were calculated using both non-spatial and spatially-explicit capture-recapture methods for comparison.

Main Results:

Scent lures did not significantly affect leopard movement distances or temporal activity patterns.
The assumption of geographic closure was met in both control and treatment surveys.
Density estimates were comparable between surveys, with no improvement in precision attributed to lure use. Non-spatial methods yielded higher estimates than spatial methods.

Conclusions:

Scent lures are not warranted for improving the precision of density estimates in camera-trap studies of leopards in productive habitats.
The use of lures did not compromise the assumptions of capture-recapture models in this context.
Further research may be needed to explore lure efficacy in different species or habitats, but current evidence suggests they offer no benefit for leopard density estimation.