Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Preparing a Celadonite Electron Source and Estimating Its Brightness
Published on: November 5, 2019
Comparison of two programs in calculating electron output factors at extended source-surface distances
Yunfei Hu1, Jonathan Andrew Lambert1, Yang Wang1
1Department of Medical Physics, Radiation Oncology Institute, Sydney and Gosford, Australia.
Independent verification of radiotherapy monitor units (MUs) is crucial. eDatabook showed greater accuracy than RadCalc for output factors (OFs) at extended source-surface distances (SSDs), though RadCalc struggled with these calculations.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Quality Assurance
Background:
- Accurate calculation of monitor units (MUs) is essential for safe radiotherapy.
- Independent verification of MUs is a critical quality assurance step.
- Discrepancies in output factors (OFs) can arise from different calculation methods in independent MU checking software, especially at extended source-surface distances (SSDs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of two independent MU checking software packages, RadCalc and eDatabook.
- To evaluate their performance in calculating output factors (OFs) at standard and extended SSDs.
- To identify potential limitations of these software packages in clinical radiotherapy settings.
Main Methods:
- Measured output factors (OFs) for electron cutouts on an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator at standard and extended SSDs (≥100 cm).
- Compared measured OFs with those calculated by RadCalc and eDatabook.
- Assessed the accuracy of each software package based on the deviation from measured values.
Main Results:
- eDatabook generally provided output factors (OFs) closer to measured values compared to RadCalc.
- RadCalc demonstrated inaccuracies at extended SSDs due to its reliance on effective-SSD curve assumptions.
- eDatabook showed improved accuracy at extended SSDs by employing linear interpolation, although it was unable to provide factors in two instances.
Conclusions:
- eDatabook offers a more accurate method for calculating output factors (OFs) at extended SSDs compared to RadCalc.
- The linear interpolation method used by eDatabook is advantageous for extended SSD calculations in radiotherapy.
- Further validation and potential improvements to RadCalc's algorithm for extended SSDs are warranted.
More Related Videos
10:23Author Spotlight: A Machine-Vision Approach to Transmission Electron Microscopy Workflows, Results Analysis and Data Management
Published on: June 23, 2023
08:31Sample Preparation and Experimental Design for In Situ Multi-Beam Transmission Electron Microscopy Irradiation Experiments
Published on: June 27, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Calculation of Electric Flux
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Overview
Thomson's e/m Experiment
A particle with charge q, speed v, and mass m enters an area from the top, where the magnetic and electric fields are perpendicular both to the particle's motion and to one another. The magnetic...
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
Calculations of Electric Potential II
Consider a...