Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Assessing Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy Species Barriers with an In Vitro Prion Protein Conversion Assay
Published on: March 10, 2015
Incongruity between Prion Conversion and Incubation Period following Coinfection
Katie A Langenfeld1, Ronald A Shikiya1, Anthony E Kincaid2
1Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Unlabelled:
When multiple prion strains are inoculated into the same host, they can interfere with each other. Strains with long incubation periods can suppress conversion of strains with short incubation periods; however, nothing is known about the conversion of the long-incubation-period strain during strain interference. To investigate this, we inoculated hamsters in the sciatic nerve with long-incubation-period strain 139H prior to superinfection with the short-incubation-period hyper (HY) strain of transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME). First, we found that 139H is transported along the same neuroanatomical tracks as HY TME, adding to the growing body of evidence indicating that PrP(Sc) favors retrograde transneuronal transport. In contrast to a previous report, we found that 139H interferes with HY TME infection, which is likely due to both strains targeting the same population of neurons following sciatic nerve inoculation. Under conditions where 139H blocked HY TME from causing disease, the strain-specific properties of PrP(Sc) corresponded with the strain that caused disease, consistent with our previous findings. In the groups of animals where incubation periods were not altered, we found that the animals contained a mixture of 139H and HY TME PrP(Sc) This finding expands the definition of strain interference to include conditions where PrP(Sc) formation is altered yet disease outcome is unaltered. Overall, these results contradict the premise that prion strains are static entities and instead suggest that strain mixtures are dynamic regardless of incubation period or clinical outcome of disease.
Importance:
Prions can exist as a mixture of strains in naturally infected animals, where they are able to interfere with the conversion of each other and to extend incubation periods. Little is known, however, about the dynamics of strain conversion under conditions where incubation periods are not affected. We found that inoculation of the same animal with two strains can result in the alteration of conversion of both strains under conditions where the resulting disease was consistent with infection with only a single strain. These data challenge the idea that prion strains are static and suggests that strain mixtures are more dynamic than previously appreciated. This observation has significant implications for prion adaptation.
Insights
Prion strains can dynamically interact within a single host, altering their conversion processes even when disease outcome remains unchanged. This challenges the notion of static prion strains, suggesting greater adaptability in mixtures.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Infectious Diseases
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Prion strains can interfere with each other when co-infecting a host.
- The dynamics of prion strain conversion during interference, especially for long-incubation strains, are not well understood.
- Prion mixtures in naturally infected animals can influence each other's conversion and incubation periods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the conversion dynamics of a long-incubation prion strain (139H) during interference with a short-incubation strain (HY TME).
- To explore how co-infecting prion strains affect each other's PrP(Sc) formation and disease outcome.
- To challenge the concept of static prion strains and explore the dynamic nature of prion mixtures.
Main Methods:
- Hamsters were inoculated with 139H strain via the sciatic nerve, followed by superinfection with HY TME.
- Neuroanatomical transport pathways of both strains were analyzed.
- PrP(Sc) properties and disease incubation periods were monitored in inoculated hamsters.
Main Results:
- 139H and HY TME share neuroanatomical transport pathways, indicating PrP(Sc) favors retrograde transneuronal transport.
- 139H interfered with HY TME infection, contradicting previous reports, likely due to targeting the same neurons.
- In cases of altered incubation periods, PrP(Sc) properties matched the disease-causing strain.
- When incubation periods were unaffected, animals harbored a mixture of 139H and HY TME PrP(Sc), expanding the definition of strain interference.
Conclusions:
- Prion strain interference can occur even when disease outcome is not altered, involving changes in PrP(Sc) formation.
- These findings contradict the premise of static prion strains, suggesting that prion mixtures are dynamic.
- Prion strain mixtures exhibit dynamic behavior regardless of incubation period or clinical outcome, with significant implications for prion adaptation.
Related Concept Videos
Viral Recombination
Stages of Infection
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Subviral Agents
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining,...

