Long-Term Outcomes After Repair of Transurethral Perforation of Midurethral Sling

Andrew Colhoun1, David E Rapp

  • 1From the *Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine; and †Virginia Urology Center for Incontinence and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction, Richmond, VA.

Abstract

Insights

Repair of urethral perforation after midurethral sling (MUS) placement shows poor long-term outcomes. Many patients experience persistent incontinence and no significant improvement in quality of life despite further treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Urethral perforation is a rare but significant complication following midurethral sling (MUS) placement.
  • Long-term outcomes after surgical repair of MUS-induced urethral perforation are not well-documented.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing surgical repair for urethral perforation secondary to MUS placement.

Main Methods:

  • Five patients with International Continence Society-International Urogynecological Association grade 4B urethral injury post-MUS underwent transvaginal sling excision and urethral repair.
  • Long-term follow-up (mean 54 months) included validated questionnaires for urinary, vaginal, and quality of life symptoms.

Main Results:

  • Four of five patients experienced persistent stress urinary incontinence post-repair.
  • Subjective outcomes, including urinary and vaginal symptoms and quality of life, showed no statistically significant improvement over long-term follow-up.
  • Salvage treatments such as physical therapy and autologous fascial slings did not yield significant improvements.

Conclusions:

  • Urethral perforation following MUS is associated with persistent incontinence and unimproved quality of life, even after surgical repair and salvage therapies.
  • This study highlights the lack of effective long-term management strategies for this rare complication.