Use of Subperiosteal Drain Versus Subdural Drain in Chronic Subdural Hematomas Treated With Burr-Hole Trepanation:

Jehuda Soleman1, Katharina Lutz, Sabine Schaedelin

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland, Aarau, Switzerland. jehuda.soleman@gmail.com.

Insights

This study compares subperiosteal drains (SPD) versus subdural drains (SDD) for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) after burr-hole surgery. Results will guide evidence-based practice for this common neurosurgical condition.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Clinical Trials
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a frequent neurosurgical condition in the elderly, associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
  • Subdural drains (SDD) reduce recurrence and mortality for cSDH at 6 months post-surgery.
  • Current neurosurgical practice lacks evidence-based guidelines differentiating between SDD and subperiosteal drains (SPD).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare reoperation rates in patients with cSDH undergoing burr-hole trepanation with either an SPD or an SDD.
  • To provide evidence for optimal drain selection in cSDH surgical management.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, noninferiority, multicenter randomized controlled trial.
  • Inclusion of 220 adult patients with symptomatic cSDH confirmed by imaging.
  • Random allocation to either SPD or SDD group, with reoperation within 12 months as the primary endpoint.

Main Results:

  • Patient recruitment initiated in April 2013.
  • Study completion anticipated by late 2016 or early 2017.
  • Ethics approval obtained; research is investigator-initiated.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence-based recommendations for cSDH operative treatment are currently limited.
  • Study results are expected to inform clinical practice for the growing cSDH patient population.
  • Findings may lead to more efficient cSDH treatment and reduced postoperative complications.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos