Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population01:14

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population

504
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the median of a single population is a nonparametric test used to evaluate whether the median of a population differs from a specified value. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require data to follow a normal distribution, making it suitable for non-normal or small samples. The test begins by calculating the difference (d) between each observation and the hypothesized median. The absolute values of these differences are ranked in ascending order, with ties...
504
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

321
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
321
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

9.0K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
9.0K
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

9.1K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
9.1K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.8K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association between urban life-years and cardiometabolic risk: the Indian migration study.

American journal of epidemiology·2011
Same author

Mendelian randomization: the use of genes in instrumental variable analyses.

Health economics·2011
Same author

Socioeconomic inequalities in height, leg length and trunk length among children aged 6.5 years and their parents from the Republic of Belarus: evidence from the Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT).

Annals of human biology·2011
Same author

Genetic variation at CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 interacts with smoking status to influence body mass index.

International journal of epidemiology·2011
Same author

Maternal and offspring adiposity-related genetic variants and gestational weight gain.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2011
Same author

Is relative leg length a biomarker of childhood nutrition? Long-term follow-up of the Hyderabad Nutrition Trial.

International journal of epidemiology·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator.

Jack Bowden1, George Davey Smith1, Philip C Haycock1

  • 1Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Genetic Epidemiology
|April 11, 2016
PubMed
Summary

A new weighted median estimator improves Mendelian randomization analysis by providing reliable causal estimates even with invalid genetic instruments. This method offers better accuracy than traditional approaches for complex trait genetic studies.

Keywords:
Egger regressionMendelian randomizationinstrumental variablespleiotropyrobust statistics

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Epidemiology
  • Statistical genetics

Background:

  • Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer causal relationships.
  • Conventional MR methods like inverse-variance weighted (IVW) assume all genetic variants are valid instruments, which can be violated in practice.
  • Increasing availability of genome-wide association study (GWAS) data facilitates MR applications, but methodological challenges persist.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel statistical method for Mendelian randomization that is robust to invalid instrumental variables.
  • To assess the performance of the new method compared to existing techniques through simulations and real-world data analysis.
  • To provide a reliable approach for causal inference in genetic epidemiology.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of a weighted median estimator for combining genetic association data.
  • Simulation studies to compare Type 1 error rates and consistency of the weighted median estimator against IVW and MR-Egger regression.
  • Application to analyze the causal effects of lipid fractions (LDL-C, HDL-C) on coronary artery disease (CAD) risk.

Main Results:

  • The weighted median estimator provides consistent causal estimates when up to 50% of genetic variants are invalid instruments.
  • Simulation analysis demonstrated superior finite-sample Type 1 error rates for the weighted median method compared to IVW.
  • Analysis of lipid fractions and CAD risk revealed a null effect for HDL-C using weighted median and MR-Egger, aligning with experimental evidence, unlike the IVW method.

Conclusions:

  • The weighted median estimator is a valuable and robust tool for Mendelian randomization studies with multiple genetic variants.
  • Both weighted median and MR-Egger regression methods serve as crucial sensitivity analyses for MR investigations.
  • These advanced methods enhance the reliability of causal inference in genetic epidemiology, particularly when instrument validity is uncertain.