Related Experiment Videos
Boosting Pose Ranking Performance via Rescoring with MM-GBSA
Paulette A Greenidge1, Richard A Lewis1, Peter Ertl1
1Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis Campus, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Chemical Biology & Drug Design
|April 11, 2016
Summary
This study tackles the molecular docking scoring problem by introducing "partial matching" to better evaluate ligand poses. Rescoring with Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area improves accuracy, suggesting pose selection based on score differences is crucial.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Structural biology
- Drug discovery
Background:
- The scoring problem in molecular docking hinders accurate identification of biologically relevant ligand poses.
- Current methods struggle to rank poses when docking scores are the primary selection criterion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the molecular docking scoring problem.
- To evaluate the performance of scoring functions like Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) and ChemPLP.
- To introduce a novel metric, "partial matching," for assessing pose accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Self-docking simulations were performed.
- MM/GBSA and ChemPLP scoring functions were utilized.
- Heavy-atom root-mean-squared deviation (HA-RMSD) was used for comparing docked and crystallographic poses.
- A "partial matching" algorithm was developed to quantify pose accuracy.
Main Results:
- The "partial matching" algorithm effectively captures cases where ligands are largely well-docked but exhibit high HA-RMSD due to flexible side chain placement.
- Rescoring poses initially ranked by ChemPLP using MM/GBSA demonstrated improved discrimination against non-cognate-like poses.
- This rescoring approach enhanced the ranking of biologically relevant poses.
Conclusions:
- Molecular docking pose selection should consider score differences relative to the top-ranked pose, not solely the rank.
- MM/GBSA rescoring of ChemPLP poses offers a more reliable method for identifying accurate ligand-target interactions.
- The "partial matching" metric provides valuable insights into ligand sampling contributions to the scoring problem.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
3.8K
3.8K
Improving Translational Accuracy
15.4K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
15.4K
Confidence Coefficient
10.9K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.9K
Aggregates Classification
1.1K
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
1.1K
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
1.4K
A Gran plot is used to predict the equivalence volume or endpoint of a potentiometric or acid-base titration without reaching the endpoint. Typically, titration data is collected as a function of the titrant's volume up to a point less than the equivalence volume and then transformed into a linear format. The straight line is extended to the x-axis, indicating the necessary titrant volume to achieve the equivalence point.
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
1.4K