Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
Evaluation of modern bioactive restoratives for bulk-fill placement
Nicoleta Ilie1, Bogna Stawarczyk2
1Department of Operative/Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Pedodontics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Objective:
To investigate the impact of storage up to one year on the micro-mechanical properties of dental bioactive restoratives (R) used for bulk-application and their intermediate layer (IL) to dentin (D).
Methods:
One giomer bulk-fill resin composite (RBC) and one glass-ionomer cement (GIC) were applied in 5-mm deep Class I cavities, which were prepared in 50 sound human molars. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24h, one week, one month, three months and one year. The variation in micro-mechanical properties (indentation modulus (YHU) and Vickers hardness (HV)) were determined in 100-μm steps in line-profiles located parallel to the tooth axis, starting 0.1mm from the filling surface, through the IL in between R and D, and ending 300μm in D.
Results:
HV and YHU were influenced by the material (p<0.001, partial eta-squared [Formula: see text] =0.011 and [Formula: see text] =0.395), immersion duration ( [Formula: see text] =0.081, [Formula: see text] =0.081) and depth ( [Formula: see text] =0.050, [Formula: see text] =0.091). The micro-mechanical properties progressively increased with immersion time in both restoratives, with a comparable time-dependency pattern, but to a different extent. IL showed weaker mechanical properties compared to more superficial cavity areas, which were maintained in RBC and even enhanced in GIC during storage. After one year of storage HV ranked in the following sequence: GIC: D: 61.4±7.25-N/mm(2), IL: 86.0±23.63-N/mm(2), R: 112.3±30.36-N/mm(2) and RBC: D: 67.2±11.55-N/mm(2), IL: 76.7±18.88-N/mm(2), R: 94.1±12.28-N/mm(2).
Conclusion:
No degradation with aging was identified in the giomer restorative. The gradual ascending transition in micro-mechanical properties from D through R identified in both restoratives might have a positive effect on the bond quality.
Clinical Significance:
Giomers represent a new category of restoratives with promising clinical behavior and good mechanical stability up to one year of aging under simulated clinical conditions.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
05:30Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025