Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Rapid Screening of HIV Reverse Transcriptase and Integrase Inhibitors
Published on: April 9, 2014
Once vs twice-daily abacavir and lamivudine in African children
Victor Musiime1, Philip Kasirye, Bethany Naidoo-James
1aJoint Clinical Research Centre bDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University cBaylor-Uganda, Paediatric Infectious Diseases Clinic, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda dMedical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK eMedical Research Council/Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda fUniversity of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe gViiV HealthCare, Brentford, Middlesex, UK. *Diana M. Gibb and Ann Sarah Walker contributed equally to the writing of this manuscript.
Insights
Once-daily abacavir plus lamivudine is as effective as twice-daily dosing for HIV treatment in children. This simplified regimen improves adherence and maintains viral load suppression, offering a more convenient option for pediatric HIV care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric infectious diseases
- HIV/AIDS treatment
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence is crucial for successful HIV treatment outcomes in children.
- Once-daily dosing regimens are hypothesized to improve adherence compared to twice-daily regimens.
- Previous studies demonstrated bioequivalence of once-daily versus twice-daily abacavir + lamivudine plasma concentrations in children, but lacked virological outcome data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the virological outcomes of once-daily versus twice-daily abacavir + lamivudine in children receiving first-line ART.
- To assess the safety and adherence profiles of once-daily versus twice-daily abacavir + lamivudine regimens.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, open-label trial (ARROW trial) involving 669 children (median age 5 years) on first-line ART.
- Children on twice-daily abacavir + lamivudine for over 36 weeks were randomized to continue twice-daily or switch to once-daily dosing.
- Co-primary outcomes included viral load suppression (<80 copies/mL) at week 48 and Grade 3/4 adverse events related to lamivudine or abacavir.
Main Results:
- At week 48, viral load suppression (<80 copies/mL) was achieved in 73% of children on twice-daily dosing versus 72% on once-daily dosing (noninferiority met).
- No significant differences were observed in viral load suppression (<400 copies/mL), drug resistance, adherence rates, or clinical/immunological outcomes between the groups.
- Caregiver preference strongly favored the once-daily regimen, with similar safety profiles between the two dosing frequencies.
Conclusions:
- Once-daily abacavir + lamivudine is noninferior to twice-daily dosing for viral load suppression in children with HIV.
- The once-daily regimen simplifies ART, potentially improving adherence and treatment outcomes without compromising safety or efficacy.
- This study establishes abacavir + lamivudine as a viable once-daily nucleoside backbone for simplifying pediatric ART regimens.
Background:
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence is critical for successful HIV treatment outcomes. Once-daily dosing could improve adherence. Plasma concentrations of once-daily vs twice-daily abacavir + lamivudine are bioequivalent in children, but no randomized trial has compared virological outcomes.
Methods:
Children taking abacavir + lamivudine-containing first-line regimens twice daily for more than 36 weeks in the ARROW trial (NCT02028676, ISRCTN24791884) were randomized to continue twice-daily vs move to once-daily abacavir + lamivudine (open-label). Co-primary outcomes were viral load suppression at week 48 (12% noninferiority margin, measured retrospectively) and lamivudine or abacavir-related grade 3/4 adverse events.
Results:
Six hundred and sixty-nine children (median 5 years, range 1-16) were randomized to twice daily (n = 333) vs once daily (n = 336) after median 1.8 years on twice-daily abacavir + lamivudine-containing first-line ART. Children were followed for median 114 weeks. At week 48, 242/331 (73%) twice daily vs 236/330 (72%) once daily had viral load less than 80 copies/ml [difference -1.6% (95% confidence interval -8.4,+5.2%) P = 0.65]; 79% twice daily vs 78% once daily had viral load less than 400 copies/ml (P = 0.76) (week 96 results similar). One grade 3/4 adverse event was judged uncertainly related to abacavir + lamivudine (hepatitis; once daily). At week 48, 9% twice daily vs 10% once daily reported missing one or more ART pills in the last 4 weeks (P = 0.74) and 8 vs 8% at week 96 (P = 0.90). Carers strongly preferred once-daily dosing. There was no difference between randomized groups in postbaseline drug-resistance mutations or drug-susceptibility; WHO 3/4 events; ART-modifying, grade 3/4 or serious adverse events; CD4% or weight-for-age/height-for-age (all P > 0.15).
Conclusion:
Once-daily abacavir + lamivudine was noninferior to twice daily in viral load suppression, with similar resistance, adherence, clinical, immunological and safety outcomes. Abacavir + lamivudine provides the first once-daily nucleoside backbone across childhood that can be used to simplify ART.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Retroviruses
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Dosage Regimen: Multiple Oral Dosage

