Chronic mesenteric ischemia outcome analysis and predictors of endovascular failure

Nikolaos Zacharias1, Sammy D Eghbalieh1, Benjamin B Chang1

  • 1Institute for Vascular Health and Disease, Albany Medical College/Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY.

Insights

Endovascular revascularization (ER) for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) offers shorter hospital stays but higher restenosis rates than open revascularization (OR). Predictors of ER failure include aortic occlusive disease and long lesions.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) management involves open revascularization (OR) and endovascular revascularization (ER).
  • Predicting endovascular failure is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies in CMI patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze outcomes of OR versus ER for CMI.
  • To identify predictors of endovascular failure in CMI patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 161 CMI patients (2008-2012).
  • Comparison of demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, etiology, and treatment outcomes.
  • Outcomes included technical success, restenosis, complications, mortality, and length of stay.

Main Results:

  • ER (72%) had shorter hospital stays but higher restenosis rates (23%) requiring OR compared to OR (28%).
  • Primary patency at 3 years was higher with OR (91%) vs ER (74%).
  • Long-term survival was higher with ER (95%) vs OR (78%).
  • Endovascular failure was associated with aortic occlusive disease and long lesions (≥2 cm).

Conclusions:

  • ER offers comparable perioperative mortality and shorter hospitalization to OR, but with higher restenosis rates.
  • Longer lesions and aortic occlusive disease predict ER failure.
  • Patients requiring crossover from ER to OR had increased perioperative mortality.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos