Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of admission screening on <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection rates in a hematology-oncology and hematopoietic cell transplant unit.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

An agentic AI system enhances clinical detection of immunotherapy toxicities: a multi-phase validation study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Informatics for Infection Prevention and Control.

Infectious disease clinics of North America·2026
Same author

ECOG-ACRIN E6293: Phase II Study of Raltitrexed in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

The oncologist·2026
Same author

Healthcare wastewater surveillance: methodological considerations for sampling, feasibility, and implementation.

Journal of water and health·2026
Same author

A public health risk model using prior healthcare exposures identifies healthcare-associated pathogen carriage.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study
08:40

Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study

Published on: November 11, 2022

1.5K

A Psychophysical Protocol to Develop Ergonomic Recommendations for Sitting and Standing Workstations.

Michael Y Lin1, Paul Catalano2, Jack T Dennerlein3

  • 1Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts Myclin6@gmail.com.

Human Factors
|April 13, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Users prefer different ergonomic setups for sitting versus standing computer workstations. These findings are crucial for developing new ergonomic guidelines for standing workstations.

Keywords:
computerkeyboardmousepsychophysical protocolworkstation design

More Related Videos

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
14:52

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication

Published on: December 11, 2013

12.2K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study
08:40

Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study

Published on: November 11, 2022

1.5K
Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
14:52

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication

Published on: December 11, 2013

12.2K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Ergonomics
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Occupational Health

Background:

  • Currently, no established ergonomic setup guidelines exist for standing computer workstations.
  • Understanding user preferences is key to developing effective workstation designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine user-selected ergonomic setups for both sitting and standing computer workstations.
  • To identify significant differences in preferred configurations between sitting and standing postures.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty adults participated in simulated office work using an adjustable sit-stand workstation over four 45-minute sessions.
  • Workstation component positions (keyboard, desk height, monitor) were recorded during alternating sitting and standing sessions.
  • Participants adjusted the workstation to their most comfortable ergonomic setup after resets.

Main Results:

  • While standing, users positioned keyboards closer to their body, set desk height lower than elbow height, and angled monitors upward more.
  • The frequency of adjustments decreased over sessions, indicating user adaptation and consistent preferences.
  • Significant differences were observed in preferred ergonomic arrangements between sitting and standing postures.

Conclusions:

  • User-preferred ergonomic setups differ significantly between sitting and standing computer workstations.
  • Existing ergonomic guidelines for sitting workstations may not be directly applicable to standing setups.
  • This study provides foundational data for creating new ergonomic guidelines for standing workstations.