Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

An Obstructive Chronic Pancreatitis Model Established Through Electrocoagulation
Published on: October 31, 2025
Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-guided FNA using a 22-gauge needle: a prospective multicenter study
Atsushi Kanno1, Atsushi Masamune1, Fumiyoshi Fujishima2
1Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Background And Aims:
Histopathologic examination is critical for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). However, specimens obtained using EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) are not recommended for histopathologic diagnosis because of inadequate sample size volume. We evaluated EUS-FNA efficacy for AIP diagnosis using a 22G needle.
Methods:
Seventy-eight patients exhibiting the imaging characteristics indicative of AIP in the pancreatic parenchyma and pancreatic duct underwent EUS-FNA with a 22G needle at 12 institutions between February 2013 and March 2014. Samples were evaluated for tissue sampling conditions, CD38- and IgG4-positive plasma cell counts, storiform fibrosis (SF), and obliterative phlebitis (OP).
Results:
Tissue specimens containing >10, 5 to 10, and 1 to 4 high-power fields (HPFs) were obtained from 29 (37.2%), 18 (23.1%), and 15 (19.2%) of 78 patients, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) CD38- and IgG4-positive plasma cell counts were 23.2 ± 18.8/HPF and 5.1 ± 6.7/HPF, respectively. SF was detected in 49 of 78 patients (62.8%) and OP in 38 of 78 patients (48.7%). According to the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC), histopathologic levels corresponded to level 1 in 32, level 2 in 13, and unclassifiable in 17 patients. Hence, 45 of 78 patients (57.7%) could be diagnosed with lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis according to ICDC.
Conclusions:
Pancreatic tissues with at least 1 HPF were obtained by EUS-FNA from approximately 80% of patients, and nearly 60% of patients were diagnosed with ICDC level 2 or higher. Our findings indicate that EUS-FNA with a 22G needle may be useful for the histopathologic diagnosis of AIP. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000010097.).
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.

