Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative risk analysis for quantal reproductive and developmental effects.

¹National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR 72079.

Environmental Health Perspectives

|February 1, 1989

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Nonlinearity and thresholds in dose-response relationships for carcinogenicity due to sampling variation, logarithmic dose scaling, or small differences in individual susceptibility.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2005

Same author

A mechanistic approach to modelling the risk of liver tumours in mice exposed to fumonisin B1 in the diet.

Food additives and contaminants·2001

Same author

A unified approach to risk characterization.

Inhalation toxicology·2001

Same author

Correlation of blood cholinesterase levels with toxicity of sarin in rats.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A·2001

Same author

Dose-response trend tests for tumorigenesis adjusted for differences in survival and body weight across doses.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2001

Same author

The use of Haber's law in standard setting and risk assessment.

Toxicology·2000

Same journal

A New Start.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

Same journal

Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

Same journal

Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

Same journal

Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

Same journal

Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

Same journal

Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

See all related articles

This study compared risk assessment methods for animal testing data. The no-observed-effect level (NOEL) approach yielded higher estimated risks than the lower confidence limit of the 1% effect dose (LED01) method.

Area of Science:

Toxicology
Risk Assessment
Developmental Biology

Background:

Animal experiments often use higher doses than human exposures to detect subtle effects.
Regulatory strategy typically uses the no-observed-effect level (NOEL) divided by a safety factor (often 100) for human risk assessment.
Limitations of NOEL have led to proposals for using dose-response curves and estimable effect levels.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the estimated upper risk limits derived from NOEL/100 with those from LED01/100.
To evaluate the reliability of traditional NOEL-based risk assessment against a more data-driven approach.

Main Methods:

Utilized 10 datasets of animal bioassay data focusing on fetal mortality or anomalies.
Calculated estimated upper risk limits using both the NOEL/100 method and the lower 95% confidence limit of the dose producing a 1% adverse effect (LED01/100).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

The NOEL/100 method resulted in estimated upper risk limits ranging from 2 x 10(-4) to 6 x 10(-4) across the datasets.
The LED01/100 method is expected to yield risks below 10(-4) (1 in 10,000).

Conclusions:

The traditional NOEL/100 approach may overestimate risks compared to the LED01/100 method.
The LED01/100 approach offers a more conservative and potentially accurate method for low-dose extrapolation in reproductive and developmental toxicology.