Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis
Published on: May 31, 2021
Sensitization profiles to peanut allergens in Belgium; cracking the code in infants, children and adults
Margaretha A Faber1, Inne Donné1, Evelien Herrebosch1
1a Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Immunology-Allergology-Rheumatology , University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital , Antwerp , Belgium.
Insights
Peanut allergy severity and clinical patterns can be predicted by specific IgE testing to peanut allergens Ara h 1, 2, and 3. Ara h 2 is the best marker for identifying generalized peanut allergy.
Area of Science:
- Allergy and Immunology
- Clinical Diagnostics
- Molecular Allergology
Background:
- Peanut allergy exhibits diverse clinical presentations.
- Component-resolved diagnosis aids in predicting peanut allergy phenotypes.
- Limited data exists on peanut sensitization profiles across broad age groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate peanut sensitization profiles in a diverse age cohort.
- To correlate specific peanut allergen sensitization with clinical outcomes.
- To identify reliable biomarkers for predicting peanut allergy severity.
Main Methods:
- Serum specific IgE (sIgE) reactivity to peanut allergens (rAra h 1, 2, 3, 8, 9) and birch pollen allergen (rBet v 1) was measured.
- Tested populations included peanut-allergic patients, sensitized infants with atopic dermatitis, peanut-tolerant individuals, and healthy controls.
- ImmunoCAP FEIA assay was utilized for sIgE testing.
Main Results:
- In infants with atopic dermatitis, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 explained 67% of peanut sensitizations.
- Sensitization to Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 was more frequent in patients with generalized reactions compared to oral allergy syndrome (OAS) or tolerant individuals.
- Ara h 2 was the most effective marker distinguishing generalized reactions from OAS and/or tolerance.
Conclusions:
- Sensitization to Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 can manifest early and is linked to more severe peanut allergy.
- Ara h 2 serves as a key biomarker for identifying generalized peanut allergy.
- Component-resolved diagnosis provides valuable insights into peanut allergy phenotypes and severity.
Objectives:
Peanut allergy shows distinct clinical patterns that can be predicted by component resolved diagnosis. However, data about peanut sensitization profiles in populations with a broad age stratification are scarce.
Methods:
Sera of 89 peanut allergic patients (age 1-70 years), 21 infants (<1 year) with atopic dermatitis (AD) sensitized to peanut, 24 age matched peanut-tolerant individuals with positive specific IgE (sIgE) to peanut and 15 healthy individuals were tested for sIgE reactivity to rAra h 1, rAra h 2, rAra h 3, rAra h 8, rAra h 9 and rBet v 1 (FEIA ImmunoCAP, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Results:
In infants with AD, Ara h 1, Ara h 2 and Ara h 3 enabled to explain 14/21 (67%) of peanut sensitizations. No sensitization to Ara h 8 or Bet v 1 was observed. Patients with generalized reactions were more frequently sensitized to Ara h 1, Ara h 2 and Ara h 3 compared to patients with an oral allergy syndrome (OAS) and peanut-tolerant patients. Sensitization to Ara h 8 was significantly more observed in patients with an OAS. Ara h 2 showed to be the best marker to distinguish patients with generalized reactions from patients with an OAS and/or peanut sensitized patients but tolerating the legume.
Conclusion:
Sensitization to Ara h 1, Ara h 2 and Ara h 3 can have an early onset and is predominantly associated with a more severe outcome. Ara h 2 is the best marker of a generalized peanut allergy.
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylaxis
Hypersensitivities
Types of Hypersensitivities
Hypersensitivity reactions are categorized into four types: Type 1, Type 2, Type 3, and Type 4. Each type has a distinct mechanism...
Cross-reactivity
Allergic Drug Reactions

