Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.6K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.1K
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.5K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.5K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

1.7K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
1.7K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

672
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
672

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Abnormal motor control effort costs in Parkinson's disease patients with apathy.

Journal of Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Superior frontal and hippocampal structures associated with onset versus recurrence of mood disorders in monozygotic twins.

Molecular psychiatry·2026
Same author

Seismocardiography for nonexercise estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of sleep extension on body weight and learning in children (More2Sleep).

Frontiers in pediatrics·2026
Same author

Delayed transcallosal conduction to the lesioned sensorimotor cortex in multiple Sclerosis: A combined TMS 7 T-MRI study.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2026
Same author

Blunted response of caudal locus coeruleus to arousing stimuli in Parkinson's disease.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

8.2K

Chasing probabilities - Signaling negative and positive prediction errors across domains.

David Meder1, Kristoffer H Madsen1, Oliver Hulme1

  • 1Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre 2650, Denmark.

Neuroimage
|April 17, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Prediction errors guide choices across different situations. Brain regions like the ventral striatum and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex process these errors universally, regardless of outcome type or sensory input.

Keywords:
DomainProbabilistic reversal learningReinforcement learningValence

More Related Videos

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

8.2K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Psychiatry

Background:

  • Adaptive behavior relies on internal models predicting outcomes, updated by prediction errors (PEs).
  • Previous neuroimaging studies examined PEs in limited contexts, leaving ambiguity about their generalizability across outcome valence and sensory domains.
  • Understanding the neuroanatomical basis of PEs is crucial for deciphering decision-making processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the brain's encoding of prediction errors is invariant across different outcome valences (reward vs. punishment) and sensory domains (abstract symbols vs. facial expressions).
  • To identify brain regions involved in processing prediction errors and their relationship with reversal learning behavior.
  • To explore how outcome valence and sensory domain interact in modulating prediction error signals.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to record brain activity in participants performing four probabilistic reversal learning tasks.
  • Tasks varied in outcome valence (reward-seeking, punishment-avoidance) and sensory domain (abstract symbols, facial expressions).
  • Analysis focused on identifying brain regions encoding prediction errors and correlating neural activity with behavioral measures of reversal learning.

Main Results:

  • Ventral striatum and frontopolar cortex showed increased activity for positive PEs, while dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) tracked negative PEs, irrespective of outcome dimension.
  • dACC and right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) activity predicted reversal behavior, with stronger responses to negative PEs correlating with less reversal.
  • Outcome valence modulated PE-related activity in the amygdala, IFG, and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, particularly in reward-seeking contexts.
  • Left amygdala showed an interaction between outcome valence and sensory domain, with heightened response to negative PEs for facial stimuli in punishment-avoidance contexts.

Conclusions:

  • Prediction error signals in key brain areas (ventral striatum, frontopolar cortex, dACC) appear to be computationally invariant across different outcome valences and sensory domains.
  • dACC and right IFG play a role in enforcing rule-based strategies, inhibiting reversal behavior based on negative prediction errors.
  • The amygdala integrates outcome valence and sensory information, especially in punishment-avoidance scenarios, highlighting domain-specific processing.
  • These findings advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying adaptive decision-making and learning under uncertainty.