Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgery.

R T Gregory1, J R Wheeler, S O Snyder

  • 1Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
|March 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

The retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic surgery offers benefits over the transperitoneal method. Patients experienced shorter operations, fewer complications, and reduced hospital stays with this alternative surgical technique.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vascular Prosthetics: the Gore-Tex ePTFE Stretch Graft.

Surgical technology international·2015
Same author

Reaction to the short communication by Ghose et al.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2014
Same author

Molecular and cellular effects of chemicals disrupting steroidogenesis during early ovarian development of brown trout (Salmo trutta fario).

Environmental toxicology·2011
Same author

Ecotoxicology of synthetic pyrethroids.

Topics in current chemistry·2011
Same author

Development of an ex vivo brown trout (Salmo trutta fario) gonad culture for assessing chemical effects on steroidogenesis.

Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2011
Same author

Treatment of glaucoma.

Transactions. Ophthalmological Society of the United Kingdom·2010

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Surgical Approaches

Background:

  • The retroperitoneal approach is an alternative to the traditional transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic surgery.
  • Comparative analysis is needed to understand the differences between these surgical methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approaches in elective infrarenal abdominal aortic surgery.
  • To evaluate operating time, blood transfusion, fluid replacement, ileus, morbidity, length of hospital stay, and mortality.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 172 patients undergoing elective infrarenal abdominal aortic surgery between June 1984 and June 1986.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: transperitoneal (119 patients) and retroperitoneal (53 patients).
  • Groups were analyzed for key surgical and patient outcome metrics.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Retroperitoneal approach patients demonstrated significantly shorter operating times.
  • Fewer cardiac complications and shorter hospital stays were observed in the retroperitoneal group.
  • Ileus duration was also significantly reduced in patients undergoing the retroperitoneal approach.

Conclusions:

  • The retroperitoneal approach is a safe and beneficial alternative for most patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.
  • This approach should be considered for routine aortic surgery due to its advantages.
  • The study supports the efficacy of the retroperitoneal approach in vascular surgery.