Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

34.5K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
34.5K
The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom02:45

The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom

61.4K
Shortly after de Broglie published his ideas that the electron in a hydrogen atom could be better thought of as being a circular standing wave instead of a particle moving in quantized circular orbits, Erwin Schrödinger extended de Broglie’s work by deriving what is now known as the Schrödinger equation. When Schrödinger applied his equation to hydrogen-like atoms, he was able to reproduce Bohr’s expression for the energy and, thus, the Rydberg formula governing hydrogen spectra.
61.4K
The Bohr Model02:18

The Bohr Model

83.0K
Following the work of Ernest Rutherford and his colleagues in the early twentieth century, the picture of atoms consisting of tiny dense nuclei surrounded by lighter and even tinier electrons continually moving about the nucleus was well established. This picture was called the planetary model since it pictured the atom as a miniature “solar system” with the electrons orbiting the nucleus like planets orbiting the sun. The simplest atom is hydrogen, consisting of a single proton as the...
83.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.6K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.6K
The Pauli Exclusion Principle03:06

The Pauli Exclusion Principle

61.0K
The arrangement of electrons in the orbitals of an atom is called its electron configuration. We describe an electron configuration with a symbol that contains three pieces of information:
61.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Inverse FIP effect plasma in the solar atmosphere: a synthesis of current understanding and new insights from AR 11967.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Signs of sulfur fractionation under high magnetic field strength.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

First ionization potential fractionation of sulfur observed with spectral imaging of the coronal environment.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Chromospheric dynamics and turbulence regulate the solar FIP effect.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Exploring the link between wave activity in the photospheric velocity driver and the FIP bias in the solar corona.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Radiative hydrodynamic simulations of first ionization potential fractionation in solar flares.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit
05:30

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.2K

Von Neumann was not a Quantum Bayesian.

Blake C Stacey1

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125, USA bstacey@brandeis.edu.

Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences
|April 20, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Wikipedia claims John von Neumann pioneered quantum Bayesianism (QBism). This essay argues that historical evidence does not support this claim, challenging the assertion that von Neumann inaugurated this quantum theory approach.

Keywords:
QBismQuantum Bayesianismvon Neumann

More Related Videos

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

15.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit
05:30

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.2K
Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

15.2K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Physics
  • Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
  • History of Science

Background:

  • Wikipedia asserts John von Neumann was the 'first quantum Bayesian' for over three years.
  • This claim implies von Neumann initiated QBism, a contemporary interpretation of quantum theory.
  • The interpretation of quantum mechanics remains a subject of active debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the historical accuracy of Wikipedia's claim regarding John von Neumann and quantum Bayesianism.
  • To investigate the origins and development of quantum Bayesianism (QBism) in relation to von Neumann's contributions.
  • To provide a historically grounded perspective on the relationship between von Neumann's work and modern QBism.

Main Methods:

  • Historical analysis of primary and secondary sources on John von Neumann's work in quantum mechanics.
  • Review of foundational texts and contemporary literature on quantum Bayesianism (QBism).
  • Comparative study of von Neumann's probabilistic interpretations in quantum mechanics versus the tenets of QBism.

Main Results:

  • The claim that John von Neumann inaugurated quantum Bayesianism (QBism) lacks robust historical support.
  • Von Neumann's foundational work in quantum mechanics, while incorporating probabilistic elements, predates and differs significantly from the core tenets of modern QBism.
  • Historical records do not substantiate the direct lineage from von Neumann to the development of QBism as promoted by Fuchs, Mermin, and Schack.

Conclusions:

  • The assertion of John von Neumann as the 'first quantum Bayesian' is historically unsubstantiated.
  • Von Neumann's contributions to quantum theory are significant but distinct from the principles of QBism.
  • A nuanced understanding of scientific history is crucial, avoiding anachronistic attributions in the interpretation of quantum mechanics.